Archive for November 5th, 2007
Plans To Destroy Turkey
Plans To Destroy Turkey
Thursday, 01 November 2007
by Mohammad Khalifa
The foreign affairs in the American Congress have decided to legislate a law that agrees the so-called the Armenian massacre claimed that conducted by the Turks in 1915. The American Congress may confirm this law in mid-November. The Turkish Presidential spokesman announced that President Abdullah Gul has dispatched a letter to President G. Bush warned him about the damages that may occur in the measures of both countries relations in case the Congress has confirmed the project. However, the warn was not beneficial; because the Congress seems to continue on to confirm the decision as a part of its campaign to annoy Bush.
It seems that USA for the first time takes decisions that damage its policies and allied relations in the world, especially with Islamic world of which Turkey is considered a part of it. But the reality is that the American policy which planned by a secret government that never cares about the allied matters in any place of the world. The intention in this idea is the perception that USA is a super power, and is capable to effect in any country whatsoever is big or small, and every country must reluctant to face USA. Upon this concept Turkey must obey, the mentioned decision is considered an interfering in internal affairs. This law is the beginning of several laws.
But why is this American contradiction politics against Turkey? What is Turkey’s fault to be served as such action? Is not Turkey a member in NATO since 1952, and has an American military base in “Incirlik”? Actually Turkey’s fault is still to be an empire country, so its area is approximately 800 thousand M2 and the population is nearly 70 million. Its social life consisted of various ethnics and many kinds of religion. There are a minority of Kurds reaches to 16 millions, minorities of Arabs about two millions, and sectarian minorities such as Alawis and Christian. In spite of the allies (as Britain and France) has punished the Ottomans after the Ottomans defeat in facing them in I. world war in 1918. They have had a vast land from Ottomans especially the western region, but Turkey remained a big country. In the framework of The Broader Middle East Project Turkey could be divided to several states on ethnicities and sectarian bases, at last get rid of Turks as they think that it is a super power in the region.
USA is performing upon this project that aims to divide the big countries in Middle East to small states, and had started on applying with Iraq. However the Congress has issued a decision on 26.09.2007 on partition Iraq into three states: For Shiites in the South, for Sunnis in the middle of the country and third for Kurds in North of the country. The Shiites and Sunnis have rejected this decision, but the Kurds have considered the decision is as their victory because by this decision they have closed to their dream of independent country that could be announced in any time under the shadow of the Americans. if a Kurdish state occurred in North of Iraq, then they will require their little state be turned to the big Kurdistan state which forms the Kurds of Iraq. Turkey, Iran and Syria.
Perhaps the Kurdish issue could be seen easy to Iran and Syria for less Kurds population in their countries. But the matter in Turkey is different and the problem is too big. There are fifteen Kurdish provinces in Turkey. If the Iraqi independent Kurds want to include the Turkey Kurdistan to their state, then the destruction of Turkey will begin. The current Kurdish government of Iraq is supporting and assisting PKK in order to continue their aggression attacks against the Turkish national establishments setting out from the North of Iraq in case the liberation of Turkey’s Kurdistan. Turkey is inspecting these events and knows well enough that the Kurdish armed groups forms too dangerous action to the existence and settlement of Turkish. But it seems that Turkey is very aware to start war against the Kurdish in North of Iraq. Furthermore US encourages the Kurds to challenge and keep annoying Turkey.
Probably some will say that; where are those who defended the secular of European Kemalists and Unitarians in Turkey, what is their attitude towards their allied USA opposing Turkey? We don’t know whether these Kemalists from the west will remain on their condition.
Armed Forces ‘are so overstretched they will need a decade to recover
Armed Forces ‘are so overstretched they will need a decade to recover’
Michael Evans, Defence Editor
The Armed Forces are “running on empty”, overstretched by the long-running operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to a report on the state of the military. “The conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan have seriously diminished the ability of the Armed Forces to meet future challenges,” the think-tank Demos said.
With such pressures affecting the Forces, the current situation was “unsustainable – financially, organisationally, operationally and in terms of military-society relations”.
“British Armed Forces need a sustained period of time – perhaps a decade – to recover from the intensity of operations undertaken since 2000,” Demos said, although acknowledging that this was unlikely “in such a turbulent world”.
Soldiers face increase in insurance costs.
The report also said that too much money was going on equipment that took years to come into service, and the Ministry of Defence was urged to spend more on personnel, including paying them higher wages to put them on the same level as the police.
“Equipment costs currently account for more than 40 per cent of the defence budget. We believe that this figure is too high and diverts resources away from where they are urgently needed elsewhere in the Force structure,” the report said.
“While high-tech equipment is important, more attention and resources should be channelled to the human dimension of the Armed Forces,” Demos said. More time was also needed to think through the range of defence missions. “The Government’s desire to use the Armed Forces as a ‘force for good’ in the world has proven to be more complex, difficult and organisationally demanding than was envisaged in the 1990s,” the report said.
“In the current environment of overstretch and resource constraint, serious consideration needs to be given to determine when it is realistic and practicable to employ the Armed Forces in this manner.”
Demos is the latest organisation to put pressure on the Government to revise its strategic policy to ease the burden on the Forces, although Gordon Brown has already announced a reduction in troop numbers in Iraq next year from 5,000 to 2,500.
The think-tank said that defence policy was based on a doctrine of expeditionary operations. But greater emphasis should be placed on “domestic operations”, having Forces ready to intervene in the event of a terrorist attack. “Training for national disasters, counter-terrorism and the protection of the UK must be a priority for our Armed Forces,” Demos said.
The MoD should also be ready to end or reduce capabilities that no longer had such relevance today.
“The Armed Forces cannot be expected to do everything, and the Government should not shy away from reducing capacity in those areas, such as antisubmarine warfare or high-level interceptors, that are of marginal relevance to the current security environment,” the report said.
Charles Edwards, head of the security programme at Demos, called on Service chiefs to be bolder in questioning the Government’s defence policy.
“Ministers and civil servants need to be challenged more often in public on issues of policy and procurement, while Service chiefs should be more forthright in questioning the decisions of government in private,” he said.
l’Iran est en mesure d’être porte-étendard médiatique des pays islamiques
A screen grab from IRNA TV, Iran’s new state-run English-language 24-hour news, shows presenter Yvonne Ridley, a former Sunday Express journalist who converted to Islam after being captured by the Taliban in 2001.
l’Iran est en mesure d’être porte-étendard médiatique des pays islamiques (Sarafraz) .
Le vice-président de la radio télévision iranienne chargés des services exterieurs, M Sarfaraz a déclaré que l’Iran était en mesure de se poser en porte-étendard médiatique de l’orient et des Musulmans face à la campagne médiatique de l’Occident et notamment des Etats-Unis.
Sarafraz a ajouté que les Occidentaux prétendaient faussement pouvoir satisfaire à eux seuls tous les besoins informationnels de l’Humanité avant de souligner que la RII a montré ces dernières décennies qu’il avait des paroles nouvelles pour ses interlocuteurs et il était en mesure d’être le porte-étendard médiatique des pays asiatiques et islamiques face à l’Occident.
L’Iran a prouvé qu’il pouvait produire un mouvement médiatique différent de celui parainné par l’Occident dans le domaine d’informations.
” l’on ose dire que l’Iran ést suffisamment compétent par faire face à la campagne médiatique de l’Occident via la création des agence d’information mutiformes, a t il ajouté.
Dimanche 04 Novembre 2007
IRIB
Le Président iranien critique la domination médiatique de l’Occident
La 44ème Assemblée Générale de l’Union Radiophonique et Télévisuelle de l’Asie Pacifique, ABU, a commencé ses travaux samedi à Téhéran après le discours inaugural du Président iranien.
Ahmadinéjad a souligné qu’avec l’instrumentalisation des médias, l’arrogance tentait de diriger les relations internationales dans le sens de ses propres intérêts.
Il a évoqué l’écart des moyens et du champ d’influence entre les médias de l’arrogance et ceux des pays en voie du développement avant d’ajouter que quelques pays arrogants contrôlaient plus de 80 % des médias et de la couverture d’information dans le monde.
Et ce alors que les pays de l’Asie Pacifique qui totalisent plus de la moitié de la population mondiale ne couvriraient qu’une infime partie des informations quotidiennement diffusées.
Les médias à la solde de l’arrogance et notamment les chaînes télévisuelles et les stations radiophoniques satellitaires présentent le monde et commentent les événements qui s’y déroulent de manière à préparer le terrain à la réalisation de leurs objectifs hégémoniques.
Ces médias jouent le rôle de porte-étendard des grandes puissances.
Leur devoir est de créer une atmosphère propre à tromper les opinions publiques mondiales et à présenter comme légitimes les politiques expansionnistes et bellicistes des puissances occidentales.
Par d’intarissables campagnes de désinformation, ces puissances défigurent les vérités et tentent d’influencer l’opinion du tiers monde, notamment celle de la jeune génération et de la canaliser dans le sens de leurs intérêts hégémoniques.
L’un des principaux objectifs des médias de l’arrogance consiste à brouiller l’esprit des jeunes et à le vider de ses idéaux et dans ce domaine, les jeunes musulmans sont une cible prioritaire.
Car dans le sillage du phénomène d’éveil qui traverse le monde musulman, l’Occident a bien constaté que les jeunes, armés de leur convictions inspirées par les enseignements sublimes de l’Islam se présentaient comme le plus grand obstacle devant les politiques hégémoniques et expansionnistes de l’Occident.
Pour cette même raison, les efforts censés ternir l’image des musulmans ou les fragiliser dans leur conviction figurent en tête des objectifs recherchés par les médias occidentaux.
Et Comme le Président Ahmadinéjad l’a souligné, l’Occident cherche à se montrer invincible à travers le prisme de ses médias, medias qui veulent tout autant à montrer irréalisables et inaccessibles les idéaux indépendantistes des peuples musulmans.
Dans une telle conjoncture, les médias des pays en voie du développement n’ont d’autre choix de coopérer afin de faire face à la domination médiatique des grandes puissances.
L’Union des Radio-Télévisions de l’Asie Pacifique avec ses 170 membres issus de 53 pays est l’une des plus grandes unions médiatiques au monde.
Elle est capable de mettre un terme à la monopolisation des informations par les médias occidentaux si ses membres conjuguent leurs efforts et décident d’une plate-forme commune destinée à durer dans le temps.
Dimanche 04 Novembre 2007
IRIB
VIVA CHAVEZ – Tha’s the way to go
VIVA CHAVEZ – Tha’s the way to go – Part 1
by CANUKISTAN_VIEW on 04.11.2007
BTW dear Hiles I am 100% with your statements and the troll should be out; always pretending to be at the edge BUT ALWAYS UNFAILING FALLING TO JUST ONE SIDE OF THE STORY.
ON THE SUBJECT
The fact of the matter is that the world has been ruled by centuries if not millennia’s by AN UNELECTED ELITE that IMPOSED THEMSELVES and their wealth agenda upon the rest of the world with mighty armies.
Furthermore, these elites consider themselves not only the political leaders of the world but also our angels and saviors with their twisted RELIGIONS and historical facts!Just one case in point is the UK monarchy and their colonies to these days.
USA presidents with very few exception HAVE ALL GENEALOGICAL CONNECTION TO UK ROYALTIES. One of the few exception was Kenedy and was killed as he opposed the Federal reserve cartel of crooks bankers, the source of this eveil domination.
Napoleon I in France did not come from these elites and therefore he was never accepted by them, even when they benefits from holding back the French Revolution.
Napoleon III made the efforts to become one them but also failed.
The point I am trying to make here is that for the huge majorities around the world :
WE HAVE NOT BEEN IN POWER, WE ARE NOT GROOMED TO BE IN POWER, WE HAVE NO EXPERIENCE IN RULING THIS WORLD, WE DO NOT KNOW THOSE ANCIENT SECRETS AS WE HAVE BEEN KEPT IN IGNORANCE AND BRAIN WASHED THROUGH OUT HISTORY.
Not too often in history we see some smart, courageous and uncorrupted leaders coming from unrelated elite origins that raise up against the rulers.
In spite of all their short coming and misconceptions and interpretations, in the final analysis they always manage to disturb, destroy the elite rules and rulers.
This is the only reasons why human race and human rights have progressed;
WE EARNED WITH BLOOD AND SUFFERING; it was never given to us.
So these leaders MUST BE PROTECTED AND SUPPORTED because a JEFFERSON, LUMUMBA, CASTRO, CHE GUEVARA, ALLENDE, CHAVEZ, MORALES, CORREA, PUTIN do not born every day !
The privileges and wealth distribution always change during this time for the benefits of the many.
The rulers go into panic, like in Venezuela today, saying the sky is falling, chaos is rampant, democracy is dying, and the feeble mind give up, the historical opportunity is lost and the leaders end up being exterminated “democratically”.
MASS MEDIA CONTROL
With more advanced knowledge and technologies, these rulers ENERGIZED US WITH CAFFEINE, SEDATED US WITH PSYCHOACTIVE DRUGS, AND ALSO CONTROL US THROUGH GENETIC MANIPULATED FOOD AND DRINKS WITH ADDITIVES, besides the media garbage daily bombardment.
But now they have broken all decency by decoding our brain functioning i.e. psychologically, neuropsychiatry, chemically.
OUR BRAINS IN SOME CASES ARE BEING MUTILATED (LOBOTOMY SURGERIES) TO CONFORM TO SOCIAL BEHAVIOR DICTATED BY THESE RULERS, AND THE LATEST IS THE IMPLANTING OF MICRO-HIPS UNDER OUR SKINS LIKE LIVE-STOCK ;
for now is voluntary, later it will be required to work in government for ‘safety’ and in corporations for ‘reliable’ management.
VIVA CHAVEZ –
That’s the way to go – Part 2
Example Center for the Study and Reduction of Violence in California :
The goal of the center was to identify ‘predelinquents’ and treat them before their ‘deviance’ and supposed propensity for violence could be manifest.
The team believed that predelinquents could be identified on the basis of several factors: socioeconomic status (poor), age (young), ethnicity (black), and sex (males). Treatments under consideration included electroshock, chemical castration, experimental drug therapy, and psychosurgery – better known as lobotomy (the ’surgical’ destruction of the frontal lobes of the brain).
The goal of the center was to identify ‘predelinquents’ and treat them before their ‘deviance’ and supposed propensity for violence could be manifest.
The team believed that predelinquents could be identified on the basis of several factors: socioeconomic status (poor), age (young), ethnicity (black), and sex (males).
Treatments under consideration included electroshock, chemical castration, experimental drug therapy, and psychosurgery – better known as lobotomy (the ’surgical’ destruction of the frontal lobes of the brain).
Lobotomy, as was mentioned in a previous article, was developed in fascist Portugal in 1935 by Dr.
Egaz Moniz as a tool of social control. It was introduced to America the following year by James Watts and Walter Freeman, the latter of whom would later boast of having personally performed over 4,000 lobotomies in the United States, for all of the following ‘conditions’: apprehension, anxiety, depression, compulsions, obsessions, drug addiction, and sexual deviance.
By the post-war years, lobotomy was big business, warmly embraced by the Veteran’s Administration and heartily recommended for vets suffering from combat-related ‘disorders.’
Moniz’s procedure did not prove too popular with his patients however.
In 1939 he was shot and partially paralyzed by a former patient. Sixteen years later, another former patient would finish the job, beating Moniz to death with his Nobel Peace Prize (actually, I don’t know what he beat him with, but there would have been a certain poetic justice had he used the undeserved award). Shock therapy was likewise an import from fascist Europe, developed by Ugo Cerletti in Italy in 1938.
Appropriately enough, this ‘medical advance’ was based on Cerletti’s observation of cattle being jolted into submission as they were being led to slaughter.
Reference: “Lies My Psychology Professors Taught Me”http://www.konformist.com/2000/psych-lies.htm
VIVA CHAVEZ -
That’s the way to go – Part 3
VIVA HUGO CHAVEZ . This is not a personality cult BUT THE FACT THAT CHAVEZ IS INSPIRING AN ENTIRE CONTINENT.
Just look at Chile, the show-case of neo-liberalism in the region, A COMPLETE FAILURE AND A BOMB THAT WILL IMPLODE AT ANY TIME :
Allende reduced poverty in 3 years to 20%; the bloody dictatorship with 17 years in power increased it to 40% and the current Concertacion a “neo-cons lights” version still is above 20% after 36 years from Allende assassination.
Chile is controlled by ex-nazis and zionists; they are the pimps of the elite and international powers. Bachelet is zionist, her key ministers are zionist like in mining and energy; the foreign affairs minister ALEJANDRO FOXLEY is a f**ker member of the Trilateral Commission founded by Rockefeller and where Cheney, Bush, Kissinger and biggest world criminal sits together and complot.
Chilean kids have one of the worst education to the point that they do not go participate any longer in international competition; furthermore when the kids demanded a better education and change the LOCE law created by Pinochet, they were brutally repressed by the police, the media, the school system.
The poverty and low salaries are so bad that has to be the catholic and protestant churches GOING AFTER THE GOVERNMENT supporting an “ethical salary” i.e. a salary that would allow the poor to survive.
Chile the richest and largest exporter of copper still lack the political will to develop an industrial nation.
It has expanded the wine, fruits, fish that have been traditionally controlled by the elite.
Allende made miracles with copper at $0.55/LB and without international financial support.
Now with copper at $3.6/lb and over $35 billions in foreign investments, IT DOES NOT MAKES ANY DIFFERENCE FOR THE VAST MAJORITY.
The current electoral process in Chile DOES NOT ALLOW REPRESENTATION OF LEFT WING PARTIES; therefore labor unions movements and left wing parties have been forbidden for over 35 years !
THIS IS THE SHAMEFUL DEMOCRACY IN CHILE in few words.
VIVA HUGO CHAVEZ EL Grande Hombre de América Latina -
saludos comandante!
Videos from Jordan Maxwell :
“Who control the world”
have a look at the following video clips and see how ‘democratic’ the elites had been through out history :
Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5 Part 6 Part 7
CHEERS FROM CANADA -
PEACE PEACE
Inevitable Turkey-Iran-Syria-Russia alliance
Inevitable Turkey-Iran-Syria-Russia alliance
The Middle East has acquired immense strategic value as one of the determining fulcrums in the global balance of power due to its being the world’s largest known storehouse of low-cost energy supplies. The region’s geopolitical importance, the kaleidoscopic nature of politics among its states, the presence of volatile social and political forces within them and the interference of world superpowers all insure that the region will remain a potentially explosive source of tension for years.
Emboldened by its military strength after World War II, Moscow prepared to carve up its southern neighbors. It demanded territorial concessions and control of the Bosporus from Turkey and refused to withdraw from northern Iran, which it had occupied in 1941. Turkey and Iran rebuffed Soviet coercive diplomacy with the support of the United States and became key allies in the American effort to contain Soviet expansion.
The Central Treaty Organization (CENTO) was a defense alliance between Turkey, Iran, Pakistan and Great Britain. Originally named the Baghdad Pact, the name was changed when the Iraqi revolution led Iraq to withdraw in 1959. The United States had observer status in the alliance but was not a party to the treaty. The fall of the shah removed the American shield from Iran, sounded the death knell for the anti-Soviet CENTO alliance and sailed Iran towards new horizons.
Now the same faith is on the road for Turkey. The measureless and injudicious backup given by the occupying power in Iraq — the US government — to the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) and to Massoud Barzani, the former tribal leader of the Iraqi Kurds and now the so-called leader of the Iraqi Kurdish region.
Turkey, taking into consideration the ongoing assaults by the PKK terrorists in the southeastern regions and the measureless backup given by US government to Iraqi Kurds, has drawn up a new strategic alliance policy that weakens ties with the US and strengthens relations with Iran and Syria, their millennium-long neighbors.
The US has failed to keep its promise to Turkey to confront the PKK. Turkey now feels that it has no choice but to attack the PKK’s sanctuaries in northern Iraq together with Iran.
Iran is also suffering from similar assaults originating from the same terrorist group located in the Kurdish region of northern Iraq under the name of Party for a Free Life in Kurdistan (PJAK).
The US and Iran are increasingly at odds over a range of issues, and Turkey has stood nearby the US as an old and devoted ally for the past 57 years.
Surprisingly, US strategists seem to be pushing Turkey and Iran together to fight against violent Kurdish attacks or into an alliance to fight together against the common enemy in the region at the cost of losing Turkey as a faithful ally. The sympathy of Turkish people towards the US had fallen sharply over the past couple of years, and it will take decades for US to recover it.
It seems it is now mandatory for Turkey and Iran to form a common cooperative ground in regard to common problems and interests. New and stronger cooperative action in the economic field by Turkey and Iran will play a major role in the eradication of the political distrust and concerns between the two countries. The parties have announced an upcoming doubling of the volume of their trade.
Both countries have already agreed on the elimination of the main source of discord: support for each other’s separatist and oppositional organizations. Iran has committed to adding the PKK to its list of “terrorist organizations.” Turkey has done the same concerning the Iranian group “Mojahedin Halk.”
The second stage is the escalation of high-level cooperation between Turkey, Iran and Syria and this is moving forward, as well.
Aversion to American global policy, in particular to the actions of the US in Iraq, the common allies of Syria and Iran, and also shared economic interests, will lead to the merging of the political strategies of Russia and Turkey. Countries that were previously historical opponents will turn into partners in the creation of a new Eurasian coalition.
The final effect of the region’s aversion to American policies will be the formation of the “union of four:” Russia, Turkey, Iran and Syria. Of course, this rapprochement between Ankara, Moscow, Damascus and Teheran will definitely affect Washington’s position in the Middle East.
