following the latest revelations of

the “operation November 1950″

 

 

 

We inform our readers that following the revelations on preparations for operations’ dirty bombs’ under false banner in Europe, several countries have put France and Germany under very close surveillance satellite. According to several sources, french clans within the national police and army have set up an ultra secret to investigate, identify and neutralize the elements within the police, internal intelligence services , Diplomacy involved in these very large operations.

The Russians have asked for full support and collaboration seamless services under sarkosystes control in research on the basis of information corroborated. Sarkozy, panicked, had denied being involved in operations, his second Squarcina ordered the release of Austrian hostages in the hands of the DST(french secret services) for fear that the Russians do their threats into effect. The Germans were also solicited and the head of Germany was obliged to provide official denial. Sarkozy and his Zionist puppet team would be directly threatened by the special cell …

Several countries have threatened the French, German and British of severe reprisals in case of attacks. At the same time Squarcina, head of the DCRI (New Secret french Zion-Police) tries not to any opposition in the territory, after the failure of ‘Riots Islamists’ planned in the suburbs, and that of’ Operation Hassani ‘Follow the revelations of’Operation November 1950.

Squaricini mounted with any piece of sabotage TGV to neutralize and reduce any opposition political movement, consequence of the most serious economic crisis that the West knows for nearly half a century. A crisis which caused riots and chaos across Europe as the continent’s peoples have been abused by their Zion elites to the extreme, who thought that launching of new crusades in the Middle East will resolve  their systemic economic problems.

 

Information will be disseminated in the coming weeks detailing the involvement of Sarkozy and his government in terrorist operations intended to support the policy of Israel.

Traduction eldib

Source in french:           http://islamic-intelligence.blogspot.com

 

80% of french citizens are against sending their soldiers to Afghanistan, of course a sarkozy Zion team terror false flag in Paris will chang this number.

 

Sarkozy backs down from missile defense criticism

 

 

French President Nicolas Sarkozy is backing down from comments critical of a planned U.S. missile defense system in Europe.

At a summit with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev on Friday, Sarkozy said the missile shield plans are misguided and will not make Europe safer. Those comments had been the strongest to date by an American ally against the missile-defense plans — and undercut the rationale behind President George W. Bush’s European security strategy.

But after Saturday’s global financial summit with other world leaders, Sarkozy said: “Ultimately, it could be a complement against a missile threat coming from elsewhere, for example, Iran.”

The plans for using sites in Poland and the Czech Republic have infuriated Russia despite the Bush administration’s insistence that they are aimed at protecting Europe from Iran.

President-elect Barack Obama has not been explicit about his intentions on European missile defense, saying it would be prudent to “explore the possibility” but expressing some skepticism about the technical capability of U.S. missile defenses.

Moscow sees the defense plans as a Cold War-style project that could eliminate Russia’s nuclear deterrent or spy on its military installations. Much of Western Europe is nervous about the idea of such major defensive weaponry stationed around the continent.

But Poland and the Czech Republic, where bad memories of Soviet domination run deep, hope Obama follows through on the plans.

Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said Saturday it wasn’t Sarkozy’s place to take a stand on missile defense.

Tusk said missile defense is a matter strictly between the U.S. and Poland, and doesn’t involve France or any other “third parties.”

“The president of France Nicolas Sarkozy expressed his view but it will have no influence on what will happen with the project,” he was quoted by the Polish news agency PAP as telling reporters in Warsaw.

“On the issue of the shield, I don’t expect either commentary or actions from third parties,” Tusk said.

Link

 

—————————–

—————————–

 

Israelis Signaling US Attack  ‘Far Bigger Than 911′

 

” DEBKA = Israeli media  disinfo/intox” it means False flags in on the way

 

The ‘warning’ below is another indication of a major false flag attack…like 9-11, the 7-7 London bombings, the Spain train massacre, the Bali slaughter, etc.

The Israelis often seem to warn about such attacks…

and years later wind up being prime suspects or are somehow alleged to be involved in them.

 

In this case, a nice clear warning would give them a post-attack blanket of insulation and plausible deniability.

 

Here is the Zion Hype West propaganda for brainwashed west people(also called sheep), Debka “zion-news” :

DEBKAfile’s counter-terror sources report that US president-elect Barack Obama, European and Russian heads of state in Washington for the G20 conference over the weekend were briefed about a probable early al Qaeda attack.

 

Obama and his team have been advised that a new al Qaeda strike is highly probable in the United States or against a key US target in Europe, North Africa or the Middle East.

 

DEBKA disclosed that al Qaeda’s Yemen base, a reliable barometer for Osama bin Laden’s schemes, issued a Directive to All Fighters in Arabia on Nov. 9 presaging a major operation in the United States that will “change the political and economic world” and be “far bigger than 9/11.”

Debka Know how to lie to US dumb citizens

 

Now it’s clear for every people with a little brain to understand that’s Zion-west prepare a Big false flags.

The West are under pressure (financial crisis) and under Zion chiefs (Sarkozy, Obama…)

The same who robed you money and economy, who break your works (GM,Chrisler)

Soon a Video or audio from Al CIAzionada will come to tell you: BOUH from Afghan mountains…………

—————-

UPDATE

One week after posting this Article, here is the False Flag Start:

Here it is, a message from “Al_Zion_CIA_West Zion carpet secret services” threat Paris France BOUH….

Al Zion-CIA eda Racially Smears Obama (even a child know that racism is forbidden in Islam, they really are not professional in history and linguistics in CIA)

It remind me In one of Zion/CIA message of Boogeyman(OBL) he cited the Bible!! whatever they know the message is for West Dumb sheep, nobody care… 

to create futur proxy wars in Africa

Here is an article to understand video manipulation : New Bin Laden Fake tape, propaganda for all brainwashed West people

—————-

 

 

That’s the signal for Zionworld terror cells for their False flags and of course all the Hype zion TV will tell you the same story it is the bad muslims who did it, we got to beat them, with a US flag moving in the wind, a hand on heart, Obama puppet will launch his genocidal Zion agenda.

 

 

———————–

Howard Zinn recently told an audience that he didn’t care if 9/11 was an inside job

———————–

Another gatekeeper illustrates the intellectual

cowardice of the establishment left

 

World renowned peace activist and left-wing anti-war icon Howard Zinn recently told an audience that he didn’t care if 9/11 was an inside job, echoing the disdainful and apathetic rhetoric of fellow liberal gatekeepers Noam Chomsky and Alexander Cockburn in dismissing the efforts of the 9/11 truth movement.

Buddy Moore, Independent Candidate for US Senate in Colorado, asked Zinn if he would join him in voicing doubts about the official 9/11 story and in particular the demolition of the twin towers and Building 7.

Zinn said he was skeptical of the official story but then stated, “I don’t know much about the situation and the truth is, I don’t care that much about it, that’s passed….that’s a diversion from what we really have to do,” adding that debating who was behind 9/11, “gets in the way of dealing with the immediate situation”.

Moore attempted to ask Zinn a follow up question about allowing the perpetrators to go free but was largely shouted down by Zinn’s fawning army of left-wing sycophants.

Watch the video clip at link

Zinn’s comments echo similar sentiments expressed by fellow left-wing luminary, Noam Chomsky, who has repeatedly expressed arrogance and contempt towards the 9/11 truth movement while invoking apathy towards the contention that there was government complicity in the attacks, despite the fact that the 9/11 attacks happening exactly as the government maintains was key to launching the invasions of both Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as the massive rollback in civil liberties that has occurred over the last seven years.

During a 2006 Internet forum event, Chomsky claimed that the 9/11 truth movement peddled “arcane and dubious theories” and had distracted activists from pursuing “crimes that are far more serious than blowing up the WTC,” presumably belittling the deaths of around 2,000 Americans, along with hundreds of thousands of Afghanis and Iraqis, as well as thousands of U.S. troops in the wars that followed that could not have been launched without the pretext of 9/11.

When a critic asked Chomsky why he was so dismissive of the supposition that 9/11 was a false flag event, pointing out numerous other examples throughout history including the bombing of the Maine, the Gulf of Tonkin incident and Pearl Harbor, Chomsky merely reiterated his insolence, stating, “The concept of “false flag operation” is not a very serious one, in my opinion. None of the examples you describe, or any other in history, has even a remote resemblance to the alleged 9/11 conspiracy. I’d suggest that you look at each of them carefully.”

Chomsky actually dismissed U.S. government complicity in 9/11 a mere four months after the event, and over a year before it was again invoked as a reason to invade Iraq, when he told an audience at a FAIR event at New York’s Town Hall, 22 January 2002, “That’s an internet theory and it’s hopelessly implausible. Hopelessly implausible. So hopelessly implausible I don’t see any point in talking about it,” in response to a question about U.S. government foreknowledge.

Note that Professor Chomsky also vehemently maintains that Lee Harvey Oswald was the long gunman in the JFK assassination, even despite polls showing that around 80 per cent of the American public believe otherwise.

Chomsky was presented with convincing evidence for a wider plot by JFK assassination experts as far back as 1969 and according to Selwyn Bromberger, an MIT philosophy professor who had sit in on the discussion, Chomsky indicated that he believed there was a conspiracy, but has failed to voice his conclusion for nearly 40 years.

It’s painfully clear that the likes of Zinn and Chomsky are intellectual cowards who, despite being abundantly aware of the fact that both 9/11 and the JFK assassination represent far wider conspiracies than the official version of events dictates, they are afraid of using their prominent soapboxes to bring either subject to wider attention for fear of whatever reprisals might ensue. As Vincent Salandria enunciates, this makes them worse than disinformation agents.

“I agree that Professor Chomsky is not a CIA agent,” states Salandria, “But with respect to his pronouncements on the JFK assassination he is worse than a CIA agent. Without being an agent, with his enormous prestige as a thinker, as an independent radical, as a courageous man, he does the work of the agency.”

Indeed, at the time of the release of Oliver Stone’s JFK movie, Howard Zinn, Noam Chomsky and another liberal luminary, Alexander Cockburn, went on a seemingly orchestrated media campaign in an attempt to convince the public that the JFK assassination was not a wider conspiracy and also that it didn’t matter even if it was.

“When cornered themselves, Chomsky and Cockburn resort to rhetorical devices like exaggeration, sarcasm, and ridicule. In other words, they resort to propaganda and evasion,” notes one blogger.

The same rhetoric was utilized when questions about 9/11 reached a crescendo. Cockburn, Zinn and Chomsky not only dismiss clear evidence that the official story is demonstrably false, but in addition attempt to generate apathy around the whole issue, classic gatekeeper behavior in preventing the left from becoming active in pursuing the truth about 9/11.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/howard-zinn-i-dont-care-if-911-was-an-inside-job.html

 

————————————-

————————————-

 

 Do You Care Who Carries Out the Next Attack on America?

 

It is Spring 2009.

Just as many people have warned, a series of attacks using nuclear “dirty bombs” kills thousands of Americans.

Government intelligence agencies point to Iran, China and Russia as the source of the attacks.

The president and Congress set in motion plans for war against the 3 giants. A war which will undoubtedly cost tens of trillions of dollars, kill thousands of Americans, and cause untold misery for years to come.

Before we launch world war 3, ask yourself: would you care if Iran, China and Russia were really behind the attacks?

Of course you would.

Well, then you would also want to know whether Bin Laden was really behind 9/11, whether rogue elements within the U.S. allowed the attacks to succeed, or whether it was actually an “inside job”.

Think about it. If, like Howard Zinn, you say “I don’t care if 9/11 is an inside job”, you are really saying you don’t care if future attacks are real attacks or false flag attacks intended to justify war against a concocted enemy.

Is that what you’re saying?

Link

 

 

 

—————————————-

—————————————-

 

 

Glenn Beck Gets Something Right

 

 

 

 

 

 

November 23, 2008

 

I don’t agree very often with any of the people who host and contribute to FOX News, but that’s not because of any hard and because of the things they say.

Usually they feed you one lie wrapped in another, smothered by a third. But every now and then they accidentally allow a little bit of truth to slip into the mix, and that’s when they get interesting.

One interesting bit of accidental truth-telling was occasioned by Wednesday’s release of yet another “al Qaeda” video, featuring “number two” Ayman al-Zawahri ([Za-WAHR-ee] whose name often appears as “Zawahiri” [Za-wa-HEER-ee] in the reports of the confused western media) .

 

The new Zawarhi video was brought to you, if you’re a subscriber, by the SITE Intelligence Group, remnant of the now defunct SITE Institute, which somehow gets these videos before they become available on the militant Islamic websites

that SITE claims to monitor.

 

SITE is run by Rita Katz, whose father was an Israeli spy executed in Iraq. This, combined with Katz’ close connection to the Bush family, may tend to explain SITE’s seemingly magical ability to obtain al Qaeda communications before the radical Islamists do so.

In any case, Ayman al-Zawahri is listed as al Qaeda’s “number two” because the confused western media cannot bring itself to believe that Osama bin Laden is dead — even though the actor who plays him in videos doesn’t look very much like him!

 

As has been clear for a long time, Ayman al-Zawahri, like the late Osama bin Laden, is a CIA asset who specializes in psyop propaganda. The psyops are usually a bit tricky. But one common theme is the “terrorist” voicing legitimate complaints against the American leadership, often in elaborate and earthy language. In this instance, Zawahri’s words in Arabic are given in English as subtitles, as provided by SITE or al Qaeda — who can tell the difference?

 

Sophisticated psyops such as this one are multi-dimensional and multi-purpose, so it’s not easy to say precisely what this video is for. But one recurring purpose has always been to paint any legitimate domestic political opposition as totally offside: immoral, treasonous, and in sympathy with — if not actually in league with — “the terrorists”.

According to the usual pattern, a “terrorist” video makes a splash and then the domestic propaganda machine hosts the echo. Of course, as with all complicated clandestine operations, there are exceptions. Sometimes the expert manipulators get it wrong, and there was a time when SITE released a video to the White House, which leaked it to the world before SITE could plant it on the militant Islamic websites

.

 

That incident resonates with the story about BBC broadcasting the collapse of World Trade Center 7 before it happened.

 

 

Q: What’s going on here?

 

A: Just don’t ask and you’ll be ok!

 

In the new video, Zawarhi compares president-elect Barack Obama unfavorably with slain civil rights leader Malcom X.

Look closely at the following mainstream news accounts of the video, and see how everything is spun. It helps to keep the following questions in mind:

·  How much of what Zawahri says is true?

·  How much of what they say about Zawahri is true?

·  Where did this video come from?

Where did Zawahri come from?

From the Times of London:

Al-Qaeda today invoked the speeches of Malcolm X in a propaganda exercise designed to divide African-Americans, accusing Barack Obama of being a “house negro”.

Ask yourself: How could the Times know what the video was designed to do?

 

In his first video message to Mr Obama since the Illinois senator was elected on November 4, Ayman Zawahiri attempted to vilify the president-elect in comparison with the black power radical, whom he described as an “honourable” African-American. 

His message, entitled The departure of Bush and arrival of Obama, appeared to have been carefully choreographed. It was staged in front of pictures of Mr Obama praying at the Wailing Wall in Jerusalem during a pre-election visit to Israel, and Malcolm X, who was murdered in 1965.

But Mr Obama’s visit to Israel, including a photo-op of him praying at the Wailing Wall, wasn’t carefully choreographed — not at all. That goes without saying … meaning that no one dares to say it. Such freedom of the press!

 

As Osama bin Laden’s deputy spoke, old footage of the black power leader’s speeches was played in the background. In one of the speeches, Malcolm X used the term “house negroes” in reference to domestic slaves who were considered more docile towards their masters than the field slaves. 

“It is true about you and people like you … what Malcolm X said about the house negroes,” he said, naming Colin Powell, the former Secretary of State, and his successor, Condoleezza Rice.

“You represent the opposite to honourable Black Americans like … Malcolm X.”

 

This is all too true. It’s all too horribly, bitterly, true. I’ve been saying it for months, and I have not been alone in this. But anyone who has agreed with me has been roundly ignored. 

By putting the truth about Obama in the mainstream media via the mouths of “terrorists”, the psyop manipulators are preempting any criticism which might someday be given a national voice … among other things.

 

He scolded Mr Obama for “choosing to be an enemy of Islam and Muslims”, saying that the Muslim “nation had bitterly received” the US President-elect’s pledge of support for Israeli security and the peace process with the Palestinians.“You have chosen to stand in the ranks of the enemies of Muslims and pray the prayer of the Jews, although you claim that your mother is Christian,” Mr Zawahiri added.

All this is true — visibly, provably true. And even the most mainstream reports don’t attempt to deny any of it. They depend on your revulsion: they want you to assume all these things must be false, simply because of who is saying them. And they want you to get angry on behalf of your “leaders”, whose legacies are so badly “maligned” by having the truth spoken.

 

Also in his video, he threatened to work towards Mr Obama’s removal if he went ahead with his proposals to withdraw troops from Iraq in order to concentrate on Afghanistan, urging him to remember “the fate” of President Bush, President Musharraf of Pakistan and Afganistan’s former Soviet occupiers. 

The recording came after an interview, broadcast on Sunday, in which Mr Obama said that he would push ahead with his campaign promise to begin pulling troops out of Iraq and switch the military focus to Afghanistan.

“What you have announced before … that you will withdraw [US] troops from Iraq [and send them] to Afghanistan is a policy that is doomed to failure,” Mr Zawahiri said in the message, made available by the SITE Intelligence Group.

“If you still want to be stubborn about America’s failure in Afghanistan, then remember the fate of Bush and Pervez Musharraf, and the fate of the Soviets and British before them,” he added.

 

This is a difficult pill to swallow for Americans who are used to swallowing the propaganda. They don’t think America has failed in Afghanistan. Or perhaps I should say they don’t realize America has failed there. 

Oh well. They’ll figure it out eventually.

Mr Obama refused to comment, declining to get into a “tit for tat with a terrorist group”, according to CNN.

 

That’s his best move, from his point of view — probably his only available move. 

What else can he do?

Can he say: “Zawahri is right. I am a house negro. My job is to look after the intrests of the rich and powerful. Didn’t you know that already? What did you think the President was supposed to do?”

Not if he wants to maintain his aura of audacity and hope and change.

Or can he say, “Zawahri is all wrong. I won’t look after the rich and powerful. I will take care of the little guy. I’ll stop America’s wars of aggression and I’ll stop the American elite from preying on their fellow-countrymen, too.”

Not unless he wants to get assassinated.

The tape was not unexpected. Intelligence officials and Mr Obama’s campaign team have been bracing themselves for terrorist groups to take advantage of the presidential transition period.

 

Here’s another big lie — another of the endless big lies in the terror myth psyop. Again it’s multi-faceted and multi-purposed. 

Aside from scaring you, it reinforces the lie that 9/11 was caused by an understandable difficulty inherent in the transition from one administration to another.

And that’s why

Both President Bush and Mr Obama have acknowledged that extremists could stage attacks to destabilise the period, which ends when Mr Obama is inaugurated on January 20.

 

The myth that 9/11 was the unfortunate and innocent result of the understandable difficulty inherent in the transition has been promoted by some very artful dodgers, including Jamie Gorelick and Slade Gorton who wrote about it in the New York Times back in July. 

Both Gorelick and Gorton, of course, were among the chief architects of the 9/11 coverup. Here’s an excerpt from their NYT psy-op/ed:

 

One of the observations of the 9/11 commission was that the deeply flawed presidential transition of 2000 and 2001 created a dangerous period of vulnerability. 

As always, the crowd coming in was dismissive of the concerns of the crowd going out. There was a mismatch between the concerns of the Clinton national security team and those of the incoming Bush team. While there were briefings between the election and the swearing-in, there was no trust — and thus no effective dialogue — between the members of the two administrations.

 

Translation: Because the Bush administration didn’t trust Bill Clinton, it paid no attention to the Clinton administration’s warnings about the imminent threat of a terrorist attack. 

This is, once again, part of the whitewash: it’s Clinton’s fault that Bush decided not to do any domestic counter-terrorism. If Clinton had only kept it in his pants when that little Lewinsky slut was around, Bush and the rest of the country could have trusted him, and the incoming Bush administration would have taken Clinton’s concerns seriously. Yeah, right!

Jamie Gorelick was on Obama’s short list for appointment as Attorney General. What does that say about Obama? Nothing you didn’t already know, I hope. But we digress…

Here’s another, somewhat more detailed report, from MSNBC:

CAIRO, Egypt – Al-Qaida’s No. 2 leader slurred Barack Obama with a demeaning racial term for a black American who does the bidding of whites in a new Web message posted Wednesday.

It’s interesting to note that all the mainstream reports categorize Zawahri’s statements about Obama as racial, when in fact the gist of them is political: This is not about what color Obama is; it’s about whose interests he protects. But of course nobody could write that one day and still have a job the next morning. And so we get nonsense like this.

Ayman al-Zawahri’s speech was al-Qaida’s first reaction to Obama’s election victory — and it suggested the terror network is worried the new American leader could undermine its rallying cry that the United States is an enemy oppressor.

In fact the Muslim world is worried — and rightly so — about the possibility that America, under the new “black” and “formerly Muslim” president, will be allowed a free hand to commit atrocites against blacks and Muslims even beyond the atrocities committed by the Bush and Clinton administrations.

Obama has been welcomed by many in the Middle East who hope he will end what they see as American aggression against Muslims and Arabs under President George W. Bush.

Their hope is contradicted by his public statements to the contrary — which proves, as if any further proof were needed, that the power of self-delusion is not uniquely American.

Some believe his race and Muslim family connections could make him more understanding of the developing world’s concerns.

They can believe anything they like, of course. Some people believe the sun revolves around the earth.

Al-Zawahri dug into U.S. racial history to try to directly knock down that belief and argue Obama will be no more sympathetic than white leaders to what the al-Qaida leader called “the oppressed” of the world.

MSNBC is apparently incapable of calling oppressed people oppressed, unless the word is in quotes and attributed to somebody else. What else is new?

 

He said Obama was the “direct opposite of honorable black Americans” like Malcolm X, the 1960s Muslim African-American rights leader, who is known among some in the Arab world and seen as a symbol of anti-imperialism. 

Al-Zawahri also called Obama — along with secretaries of state Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice — “house Negroes.”

They should be flattered. Among all the terms that fit, “house Negro” is probably the most polite.

 

The video included old footage of speeches by Malcolm X in which he explains the term, saying black slaves who worked in their white masters’ house were more servile than those who worked in the fields. Malcolm X used the term to criticize black leaders he accused of not standing up to whites and discrimination. 

Speaking in Arabic, al-Zawahri used the phrase “abeed al-beit,” which literally translates as “house slaves.” But in the video message, posted on Islamic militant Web sites Wednesday, al-Qaida supplied English subtitles of the speech that translated the phrase as “house Negroes.”

 

Considering that all the house Negroes were slaves and all the house slaves were Negroes, this little discrepancy doesn’t seem to make much difference. But this article — like all mainstream news on this and many other subjects — is chock full of details that don’t make any difference. 

Consider the White House response to the video:

In Washington, White House press secretary Dana Perino said the tape is a reminder that al-Qaida is irrational.

There’s nothing irrational about the way Perino digs herself into a hole, though, right?

“What we have here is more despicable and pathetic comments by al-Qaida terrorists,” Perino said. “And in America, we are going to have a smooth transition from one administration to the next, and that will be a period of change in our country. What won’t change is our commitment as a country to fighting terrorism. And I think that these comments just remind everybody of the kind of people that we’re dealing with.”

The “transition” is going to be “smooth” precisely because Obama has not challenged — and will not challenge — the bogus assumptions behind “our commitment as a country” to fighting bogus terrorism, looking for bogus terrorists, and fomenting terror of our own. Therefore it won’t be much of a change as far as the rest of the world is concerned.

There was no immediate reaction from Obama’s transition team.

As noted.

 

The 11-minute, 23-second video featured an audio message by al-Zawahri, played over a still image of the al-Qaida No. 2. 

The video graphics underlined the contrast al-Zawahri aimed to show: On one side of the screen was a photo of Obama wearing a Jewish skullcap and meeting Jewish leaders. On the other side was a photo of Malcolm X praying in a mosque. Interspersed was footage of Malcolm X talking of a “worldwide revolution” against the “Western power structure.”

Al-Zawahri addressed “all the world’s weak and oppressed,” and warned them: “America has put on a new face, but its heart full of hate, mind drowning in greed and spirit which spreads evil, murder, repression and despotism continue to be the same as always.”

 

Again, this is exactly true. I wish it were otherwise. But wishes are not the stuff of truth-telling. 

Zawahri spoke directly to Obama:

 

“You were born to a Muslim father, but you chose to stand in the ranks of the enemies of the Muslims, and pray the prayer of the Jews, although you claim to be Christian, in order to climb the rungs of leadership in America,” he said. 

“It appears that you continue to be captive to the same criminal American mentality towards the world and towards the Muslims,” he said.

It certainly does appear that way. But not to professional spin-merchants, who cannot afford to tell the obvious truth.

 

Jeremy Binnie, an analyst with Jane’s Terrorism and Insurgency Center, said al-Zawahri’s message suggests al-Qaida leaders are worried “that Obama could be effective in rebuilding America’s image.” 

“They hated Bush, but Bush was good for them in many ways because he was such a polarizing figure. But Obama seems at the moment to be a more uniting figure,” Binnie said.

They hated Bush but he was good for them; they hate Obama because he will be bad for them …

“Al-Qaida very much would like the U.S. to stay with its old policies that put it in opposition to much of the Muslim world.”

 

… They want us to stay in Afghanistan and that’s why they want us to leave … 

All this nonsense feeds into the public pronouncements that al Qaeda is “irrational”. But al Qaeda is more than irrational. al Qaeda is fictional!

Blind acceptance of the government/media spin is irrational. Belief in the independent existence of al Qaeda is irrational! But MSNBC can hardly say that, any more than Barack Obama can.

Al-Zawahri proclaimed Obama’s victory a sign that Americans had realized the failure of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

 

This part is unclear: If Americans realize the failure of the war in Afghanistan, then why did they elect a new president who wants to escalate the war in Afghanistan?

 

Because American voters are irrational! And that’s a fact that cannot be denied.

But it doesn’t matter, either, because our electoral system is so compromised that the will of the people doesn’t express itself at the ballot box anymore. So we’re stuck with what we’ve got — for as long as we are willing to stay stuck.

MSNBC’s coverage of the Zawahri video concludes as follows:

 

He urged Islamic militants everywhere to continue their jihad, or holy war, saying, “Your enemy’s stagger has begun, so don’t stop hitting him.” 

Al-Zawahri said Obama’s plan to shift troops to Afghanistan is doomed to failure, because Afghans will resist.

“Be aware that the dogs of Afghanistan have found the flesh of your soldiers to be delicious, so send thousands after thousands to them,” he said.

Al-Zawahri specifically addressed al-Qaida fighters in Iraq, saying, “your enemy has admitted defeat,” and that as U.S. troops withdraw, “you must persevere, for victory is in an hour of perseverance.”

He also told Islamic militants in Somalia, who have been capturing towns in an advance against the tenuous central government, “don’t put down your weapons before the Mujahed state of Islam … has been set up in Somalia.”

 

This summary reveals another aspect of the psy-op: the manipulators are always trying to foment more “terrorist” resistance, in order to “justify” more armed intervention in more foreign countries. 

And everything we’ve read about this video so far amounts to the typical mainstream spin on what is, after all, a transparently thin and mass-murderous sham.

But way off to the side of the mainstream sits FOX News, telling even more outrageous lies, more vicious, more ridiculous lies of the sort which are enabled by all the other lies about al Qaeda and its videos that the mainstream has been telling.

Here’s Glenn Beck:

While many Americans want to ignore the threat posed by Islamic extremism and collectively hope it has gone away, Al Qaeda is determined not to let us forget.

 

On the contrary, the American government and media are the ones who are determined not to let us forget. They’re determined not to let us stop and think, either. Otherwise, the mainstream accounts would be telling you about what a farce SITE is, and how disgusting it is to have an Israeli mole doing supposed intelligence gathering for our national government, and much more, too. 

But instead, they insist on taking all this stuff seriously.

In their first video release since the election of Barack Obama, Al Qaeda’s No. 2 — Ayman al-Zawahiri — said Obama’s election was “the American people’s admission of defeat in Iraq.” Unless I’ve been holding the graphs of every measurable facet of the war upside down for the last couple of years, I don’t think that we’ve admitted anything of the sort.

It’s the unmeasurable facets of the war that are destroying America; it’s no wonder they don’t show up on FOX news graphs. And it’s no wonder Glenn Beck is denying what everyone already knows. That is his job, after all.

He also claimed that Obama’s idea of sending troops currently fighting in Iraq over to Afghanistan wouldn’t work, but we should send more anyway because the “dogs of Afghanistan have found the flesh of your soldiers to be delicious.” Classy guy.

 

Not half as classy as bombing innocent sleeping children and then denying it, and claiming that the survivors had fabricated the evidence. 

Not half as classy as imprisoning hundreds of innocent people for years and years without even giving them a chance to prove their innocence.

Not half as classy as invading sovereign countries based on deliberately fabricated lies.

 

But the overall message was very clear: the election of Barack Obama changes nothing to our enemies. Zawahiri said Obama appears to “continue to be captive to the same criminal American mentality towards the world and towards the Muslims.” He called Obama “dishonorable” and a “house Negro,” and he said Obama would continue the “crimes of the American Crusade.” 

After we’ve been told for months that the election of Obama would magically make our enemies start to like us again, this might surprise some people. But the truth is no change in our voting patterns, no talk of meeting without preconditions, and no blanket promises of diplomacy will be enough to make these people change their minds about us.

Will Barack Obama be as tough as he needs to be? That remains to be seen. There’s not much in his record that makes me believe it, but I hope so. If he is, I’ll be happy to stand with him — because if our enemies aren’t defining us by party, we shouldn’t either.

Here’s one point Glenn Beck and I agree about:

no change in our voting patterns, no talk of meeting without preconditions, and no blanket promises of diplomacy will be enough to make these people change their minds about us.

 

Assuming that by “these people”, Beck means the people who actually do hate us, and not the actors in the psyop drama, then why do they hate us? 

It’s because of what we have done to them, and to their families, and to their countries.

Promises of diplomacy won’t make any of that damage go away.

Talk of meetings without preconditions won’t bring millions of innocent people back from the dead.

Changing our voting patterns won’t help any of those people at all — especially when we shift our support from a president who has spent the past eight years increasing the military budget and using it to get his way in the world, to a president-elect who pledges to increase the military budget and use it to get his way in the world.

If we were sufficiently color-blind to see beyond Obama-is-black and Bush-is-white, and also to see beyond Obama-is-a-Democrat and Bush-is-a-Republican, what would we be left with? Two guys with funny-looking ears who will tell any lie at all, in a quest to become “the most powerful man in the world”, and who are quite willing to use that power to ruin the lives of millions of innocent people.

And instead of being shocked and appalled at Zawahri, all of America would be shocked and appalled at Glenn Beck.

If, if, if: We’re in fantasy land again.

Here’s the one other bit of Beck’s column that I partially agree with:

if our enemies aren’t defining us by party, we shouldn’t either.

 

I don’t agree completely, because it doesn’t matter to me how “our enemies” are “defining us”. I don’t even believe that one person can “define” another. But that’s beside the point. The point is: I care about what people do, not what party they join. 

And that’s what matters to the people of Afghanistan, and Iraq, and Somalia, and Pakistan, and all the other countries where the American military routinely uses its exceptional might, against innocent unarmed people, with unmitigated hubris — as if somehow it were our right to destroy lives and homes in any foreign countries we choose.

When bombs start falling, the people being shredded and crushed and burned to death don’t much care who the president is, or what color his skin is, much less what political party he belongs to. Of course they hate America. You’d hate America too, if America did things like that to you.

But you wouldn’t expect to hear such things from FOX News, would you?fast rule; it’s just

 

 

winterpatriot.blogspot.com/2008/11/glenn-beck-gets-something-right.html

 ———————————-

 

Fake Alqaeda

 

 

 

 

antiwar.com – By Way of Deception, by Justin Raimondo

 

smh.com.au – Palestinians arrest al-Qaeda ‘poseurs’

 

 

Of the MOSSAD, the Israeli intelligence service, the SAMS officers say: “Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act.” [Washington Times - 9/10/2001]

 

 

 

 

The FBI lists Gadahn’s aliases as Abu Suhayb Al-Amriki, Abu Suhayb, Yihya Majadin Adams, Adam Pearlman, and Yayah.

But Adam Pearlmen is his REAL name! Adam is the grandson of the late Carl K. Pearlman; a prominent Jewish urologist in Orange County. Carl was also a member of the board of directors of the Anti-Defamation League, which was caught spying on Americans for Israel in 1993, much as AIPAC has been caught up in the more recent spy scandal.

 

————————————————-

 

The FBI lists Gadahn’s aliases as Abu Suhayb Al-Amriki, Abu Suhayb, Yihya Majadin Adams, Adam Pearlman, and Yayah.

But Adam Pearlmen is his REAL name! Adam is the grandson of the late Carl K. Pearlman; a prominent Jewish urologist in Orange County. Carl was also a member of the board of directors of the Anti-Defamation League, which was caught spying on Americans for Israel in 1993, much as AIPAC has been caught up in the more recent spy scandal.

————————————

The FBI lists Gadahn’s aliases as Abu Suhayb Al-Amriki, Abu Suhayb, Yihya Majadin Adams, Adam Pearlman, and Yayah.

But Adam Pearlmen is his REAL name! Adam is the grandson of the late Carl K. Pearlman; a prominent Jewish urologist in Orange County. Carl was also a member of the board of directors of the Anti-Defamation League, which was caught spying on Americans for Israel in 1993, much as AIPAC has been caught up in the more recent spy scandal.

————————————

 

 

Sent in by a reader: I recently saw the article you linked about Adam Pearlman and his brand new feature film in which he plays the character Azzam Al-Amrika. As someone who speaks Arabic, I thought it would be interesting for WRH readers to know a little bit about this particular name. First, Azzam in Arabic means either “determined” or “resolved”. Second, “Al-Amrika” (it’s sometimes spelled “Amerika”) translates back to “America”. Interesting use of words Mr. Pearlman is using for a name, I’d say. But even without having to translate the whole name, no Arab has the last name of Amrika. The name, translated, almost sounds like a Bush soundbite.

 

 The Phony (MOSSAD) Al Qaeda cell in Palestine

 

 

 

Sent in by a reader: I recently saw the article you linked about Adam Pearlman and his brand new feature film in which he plays the character Azzam Al-Amrika. As someone who speaks Arabic, I thought it would be interesting for WRH readers to know a little bit about this particular name. First, Azzam in Arabic means either “determined” or “resolved”. Second, “Al-Amrika” (it’s sometimes spelled “Amerika”) translates back to “America”. Interesting use of words Mr. Pearlman is using for a name, I’d say. But even without having to translate the whole name, no Arab has the last name of Amrika. The name, translated, almost sounds like a Bush soundbite.

 

 The Phony (MOSSAD) Al Qaeda cell in Palestine

 

 

 

Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon … said that al-Qaeda militants were operating in the Gaza Strip and Lebanon. “We know that they are there. We know that they are in Lebanon, working closely with Hezbollah. We know that they are in the region,” he said. [BBC News - 12/5/2002]

 

Officials from the Palestinian Authority have accused the Israeli spy agency Mossad of setting up a fake al-Qaeda terrorist cell in Gaza. Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat said that Israel had set up the mock cell in order to justify attacks in Palestinian areas. [BBC News - 12/8/2002]  

  

 

 

 

 

larouchepub.com – Mossad Exposed in Phony ‘Palestinian Al-Qaeda’ Caper

 

 

 

 

 

Of the MOSSAD, the Israeli intelligence service, the SAMS officers say: “Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act.” [

 

smh.com.au - Palestinians arrest al-Qaeda 'poseurs'

 

Washington Times - 9/10/2001]

 

 

————————————– 

 

 

Adam Yahiye Gadahn: The Fake Terrorist

 

The FBI lists Gadahn’s aliases as Abu Suhayb Al-Amriki, Abu Suhayb, Yihya Majadin Adams, Adam Pearlman, and Yayah.

As someone who speaks Arabic, I thought it would be interesting for WRH readers to know a little bit about this particular name.

First, Azzam in Arabic means either “determined” or “resolved”.

Second, “Al-Amrika” (it’s sometimes spelled “Amerika”) translates back to “America”. Interesting use of words Mr. Pearlman is using for a name, I’d say.

But even without having to translate the whole name, no Arab has the last name of Amrika. The name, translated, almost sounds like a Bush soundbite.

——————————

 

 

And another faker surfaces! ONE of al-Qaeda’s most dangerous figures has been revealed as a double agent working for MI5, raising criticism from European governments, which repeatedly called for his arrest.

 

On any given day, log on to RevolutionMuslim.com and a host of startling images appear:

— The Statue of Liberty, with an ax blade cutting through her side;

— Video mocking the beheading of American journalist Daniel Pearl, entitled “Daniel Pearl I am Happy Your Dead :) “;

— Video of a puppet show lampooning U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq;

— The latest speech from Sheikh Abdullah Faisal, an extremist Muslim cleric convicted in the UK and later deported for soliciting the murder of non-Muslims.

Even more surprising is that RevolutionMuslim.com isn’t being maintained in some remote safe house in Pakistan. Instead, Yousef al-Khattab, the Web site creator, runs it from his home in the New York City Borough of Queens.

…

Formerly known as Joseph Cohen, al-Khattab is an American-born Jew who converted to Islam after attending an Orthodox Rabbinical school, which he later described as a “racist cult.”

 

————————————

 

Al-Qaeda cleric exposed as an MI5 double agent

Britain ignored warnings – which began before the September 11 attacks – from half a dozen friendly governments about Abu Qatada’s links with terrorist groups and refused to arrest him. Intelligence chiefs hid from European allies their intention to use the cleric as a key informer against Islamic militants in Britain.

…

Indignant French officials accused MI5 of helping the cleric to abscond. While he remained on the run, one intelligence chief in Paris was quoted as saying: “British intelligence is saying they have no idea where he is, but we know where he is and, if we know, I’m quite sure they do.”

 

ONE of al-Qaeda’s most dangerous figures has been revealed as a double agent working for MI5, raising criticism from European governments, which repeatedly called for his arrest.

Britain ignored warnings – which began before the September 11 attacks – from half a dozen friendly governments about Abu Qatada’s links with terrorist groups and refused to arrest him. Intelligence chiefs hid from European allies their intention to use the cleric as a key informer against Islamic militants in Britain.

…

Indignant French officials accused MI5 of helping the cleric to abscond. While he remained on the run, one intelligence chief in Paris was quoted as saying: “British intelligence is saying they have no idea where he is, but we know where he is and, if we know, I’m quite sure they do.”

 

So,

1. We have MI5 (British CIA) posing as Alqueda.
“Al-Qaeda cleric exposed as an MI5 double agent”,

 

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/printFriendly/0,,1-3-1050175,00.html

  

2. We have Mossad (Israel CIA) posing as ALqueda in Palestine:

 fakealqaeda.html

  

itemNo=241042&contrassID=2&subContrass

ID=5&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y&itemNo=241042
terrorist.html

 

 

 

  

3. We have USA posing as Alqueda:

  

The FBI lists Gadahn’s aliases as Abu Suhayb Al-Amriki, Abu Suhayb, Yihya Majadin Adams, Adam Pearlman, and Yayah. But Adam Pearlmen is his REAL name! Adam is the grandson of the late Carl K. Pearlman; a prominent Jewish urologist in Orange County. Carl was also a member of the board of directors of the Anti-Defamation League, which was caught spying on Americans for Israel in 1993, much as AIPAC has been caught up in the more recent spy scandal.

3. We have israel posing as alqueda in the phillipines.

http://www.mb.com.ph/PROV2004061411759.html

 

 

 

 

 

The two British operatives, arrested by Basra police and later freed by a British military operation, were identified by the BBC as “members of the SAS elite special forces” (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/424614.stm). They were disguised by wigs and Arab dress. Iraqi sources reported that the Iraqi police were watching the two, and when they tried to approach them they shot two policemen and tried to escape the scene. The Iraqi police chased and captured them, to discover large amount of explosives planted in the car, which apparently was planned to be remotely detonated in the busy market of Basra. The SAS involvement in Iraq was discovered on the 30th of January 2005 when an RAF Hercules plane crashed near Baghdad killing then British servicemen after dropping off fifty SAS members north of Baghdad to fight Iraqi guerillas.

 

 

ARE YOU SURE YOU ARE WATCHING THE RIGHT ENEMY !!!!!!!

 

CIA + Mossad + MI5 = AlQueada

 

The greatest false-flag operations conducting in the history on man !!!!

 

 

 

In case you weren’t paying attention…

 

 

·         Vinnell bombing leader Khaled Jehani, fought for the CIA in Afghanistan, Bosnia & Chechnya

·         Members of the Moroccan terror group Salafi Jihadi fought for the CIA in Afghanistan, Chechnya, Dagestan, Bosnia and Kosovo

·         USS Cole Bomber Jamal al-Badawi fought for the CIA in Bosnia

·         Zacarias Moussaoui fought for the CIA in Chechnya

·         Khalid Sheikh Mohammed fought for the CIA in Afghanistan

·         Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman fought for the CIA in Afghanistan

·         Head of Egyptian Islamic Jihad Ayman al Zawahiri, fought for the CIA in Bosnia

·         His brother Ayman al-Zawahiri fought for the CIA in Kosovo

·         Abdullah Azzam, “one of the ideological founders of Hamas” fought for the CIA in Afghanistan

·  When Osama Bin Ladin Was Tim Osman

·  Zbigniew Brzezinski: “Your cause is right, God is on your side.”

·  CIA “Arranged” for Passports for Al Qaeda Terrorists & Brought Them to the USA to Recruit for Jihads

·  Will the CIA Leave Their Saudi Partners in Crime Holding the Bag?

·  “The Farce Goes On – The Hunt for Ayman Zawahiri, Mohammad Omar, & Osama

·  “Moussaoui, Khadr, & Ressam Are “Graduates” of CIA’s Khalden Camp for Afghanistan & Balkans “Jihads”

·  Bin Laden Puppetmasters Smoked Out In Balkans

·  The CIA arranged for HUM guerrillas to fight in Bosnia & Kosovo

·  Bin-Ladin and KLA have a ‘joint’ cash box in the United States

·  The CIA & Bin Laden worked hand-in-glove in KLA operations

·  U.S. Protects Al-Qaeda Terrorists in Kosovo

·  Wolfowitz Meets “in Private” with NLA Terrorist Ali Ahmeti

·  America used Islamists to arm the Bosnian Muslims

·  Bosnia, 1 degree of separation from Al-Qaeda

·  Where was the “Concern” about “al-Qaida Operating in Iran” during the War in Bosnia?

·  Terror mastermind with taste for high life

·  US Has Al Qaida Backers List

·  CIA Told “Malaysian secret police” to “Monitor” Al Qaeda Meeting on Plans to Hit WTC on 9-11-2001

·  The CIA’s “Operation Cyclone” – Stirring the Hornet’s Nest of Islamic Unrest”

·  The Muslim Brotherhood: The Globalists’ Secret Weapon

·  U.S. Armed, Promoted Accused September 11 Terrorist Mastermind

·  CIA Bankrolled System of Madrassas & Training Camps to Brainwash “Jihad” Warriors

·  British Press Gagged on Reporting MI6’s £100,000 bin Laden Payoff

·  Ramzi Yousef was part of a CIA recruitment drive in New York and he did have “ties” to Bin Laden

·  CIA Recruits Terrorist Agents At Guantanamo

·  Oregon group thrives despite al Qaeda ties

·  Sniper link to al Qaeda investigated

·  Who is behind the “Terrorist Network” in Northern Iraq, Baghdad or Washington?

·  Did Rambo ever stop loving Osama?

fakealqaeda.html

http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?

 

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/palestinians_arrest_al_qaeda_poseurs.htm

 

http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j120902.html

 

http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2002/2949idf_qaeda.html

 

 

See Also:

Israeli suspected to be a member of al-Qaeda arrested in the Philippines

Is ‘Al Qaeda’ the modern incarnation of ‘Emmanuel Goldstein’?

A “Palestinian Terrorist” Wearing the Star of David

The 5 Dancing Israelis Arrested on 9/11

 

 

 

———————————————

 

 

Rogue Israeli Mossad-British Team Behind

French Students Assassination

 

 

French Students Assassination:

Rogue Israeli Mossad-British Team Behind

 

http://eldib.wordpress.com/2008/09/07/rogue-israeli-mossad-british-team-behind-french-students-assassination/

 

 

 

——————————————-

Don’t believe the Zion hype

Fresh links between Iran’s Revolutionary Guards and al-Qaeda have been uncovered following interception of a letter from the terrorist leadership that hails Tehran’s support for a recent attack on the American embassy in Yemen, which killed 16 people.

Delivery of the letter exposed the rising role of Saad bin Laden, son of the al-Qaeda leader, Osama as an intermediary between the organisation and Iran. Saad bin Laden has been living in Iran since the fall of the Taliban in Afghanistan in 2001, apparently under house arrest.

 

 

 

The letter, which was signed by Ayman al-Zawahiri, al-Qaeda’s second in command, was written after the American embassy in Yemen was attacked by simultaneous suicide car bombs in September.

Western security officials said the missive thanked the leadership of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards for providing assistance to al-Qaeda to set up its terrorist network in Yemen, which has suffered ten al-Qaeda-related terror attacks in the past year, including two bomb attacks against the American embassy.

In the letter al-Qaeda’s leadership pays tribute to Iran’s generosity, stating that without its “monetary and infrastructure assistance” it would have not been possible for the group to carry out the terror attacks. It also thanked Iran for having the “vision” to help the terror organisation establish new bases in Yemen after al-Qaeda was forced to abandon much of its terrorist infrastructure in Iraq and Saudi Arabia.

There has been intense speculation about the level of Iranian support for al-Qaeda since the 9/11 Commission report into al-Qaeda’s terror attacks against the U.S. in 2001 concluded that Iran had provided safe passage for many of the 9/11 hijackers travelling between Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia prior to the attacks.

Scores of senior al Qaeda activists – including Saad bin Laden – sought sanctuary in Iran following the overthrow of the Taliban, and have remained in Tehran ever since. The activities of Saad bin Laden, 29, have been a source of Western concern despite Tehran’s assurances that he is under official confinement.

But Iran was a key transit route for al Qaeda loyalists moving between battlefields in the Middle East and Asia. Western security officials have also concluded Iran’s Revolutionary Guards have supported al-Qaeda terror cells, despite religious divisions between Iran’s Shia Muslim revolutionaries and the Sunni Muslim terrorists.

Iran is active in Yemen, Osama bin Laden’s ancestral homeland. The country has been a focal point for al-Qaeda, which has found relatively easy targets in its lawless environment. “Yemen is now a key strategic base for al-Qaeda’s operations, as well as being fertile recruitment territory,” said a senior Western security official. “Iran’s Revolutionary Guards have provided important support in helping al-Qaeda to turn Yemen into a major centre of operations.”

Apart from the terror attacks against the US embassy al-Qaeda has also threatened to attack the British and Saudi Arabian embassies in Yemen.

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/3506544/Iran-receives-al-Qaeda-praise-for-role-in-terrorist-attacks.html

 

“Islamic Jihad” arrested cell links to Israeli intelligence

SANA’A, Oct. 07 (Saba) – Investigations with the six-member terrorist cell of “Islamic Jihad” arrested late in September have disclosed an alleged link to Israeli intelligence, a security source said on Tuesday.

The investigations and the computer seized with the cell have revealed of correspondence between the cell’s deputy leader named Bassam Abdullah Fadhel al-Haidari and an intelligence body in Israel, which has been included a support request to implement terrorist acts inside Yemen, according to the source.

Investigations are still underway, the source said, adding that when completion, the case’s file would be sent to justice.

During his meeting with officials and dignitaries in Hadramout governorate, President Ali Abdullah Saleh unearthed last Monday arresting a terrorist cell has links with Israeli intelligence, despite raising a banner for Islam.

The cell included six members led by Emad Ali Saeed al-Rwoni, known as “Abu al-Gaith al-Miqdad al-Yamani”. It has sent several threatening letters of targeting Arab and foreign embassies in Yemen such as embassies of Britain Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates.

The cell has been arrested after a terrorist attack on the U.S. embassy on Wednesday September 17, when a twin car bomb has rocked the US embassy in Sana’a killing 16 people including seven of troops guarding the embassy and four civilians and six attackers. The civilians included two Yemenis, an Indian women and a US citizen from a Yemeni origin.

AF/AF

 

http://www.sabanews.net/en/news165472.htm

Iran brings down Israeli spy network

 
http://eldib.wordpress.com/2008/11/24/iran-brings-down-israeli-spy-network-israeli-squadron-devising-attack-on-iran-chavez-party-wins-majority-in-polls/

 

 

(all TV, radio, newspapers)

 

 They never tell the true

 

 

ALQAIDA IS Zion WEST False Flags

 

Unraveling The Myth Of Al Qaida

 

7/7 London Bombing : The Brainwashing – MI5 did 7/7 london Bombing

 

The alleged ringleader of the 7/7 London bombings, was working for British intelligence agency MI5 as an informant

 

Attentats de LONDRES du 7 JUILLET 2005 - Conspiration

 

More villification of de Menezes by the British media (Update: Image manipulated; counterfeit passport stamp)

 

Al-Qaeda, the Eternal Covert Operation: War on Terror Propaganda

 

“The U. S. is supporting Israeli-sponsored terrorism”

 

What Nobody Wants To Know About Somalia And Why; And What That Means

 

Islamabad Hotel Bombing: A CIA/MI6/MOSSAD false flag like Bali and Jakarta

 

Who is behind Human Rights Watch? Why human rights are wrong

 

Conspiracy of Silence: Corporate Media Refuses to Cover Bilderberg Confab

 

THE CIA AND THE MEDIA 

 

  

But Adam Pearlmen is his REAL name! Adam is the grandson of the late Carl K. Pearlman; a prominent Jewish urologist in Orange County. Carl was also a member of the board of directors of the Anti-Defamation League, which was caught spying on Americans for Israel in 1993, much as AIPAC has been caught up in the more recent spy scandal.

  

Sent in by a reader: I recently saw the article you linked about Adam Pearlman and his brand new feature film in which he plays the character Azzam Al-Amrika.

 

“Ana raicha Al Qaeda” is colloquial for “I’m going to the toilet”. A very common and widespread use of the word “Al-Qaeda” in different Arab countries in the public language is for the toilet bowl. This name comes from the Arabic verb “Qa’ada” which mean “to sit”, pertinently, on the “Toilet Bowl”. In most Arabs homes there are two kinds of toilets: “Al-Qaeda” also called the “Hamam Franji” or foreign toilet, and “Hamam Arabi” or “Arab toilet” which is a hole in the ground. Lest we forget it, the potty used by small children is called “Ma Qa’adia” or “Little Qaeda”.

 

So, if you were forming a terrorist group, would you call yourself, “The Toilet”?

  

 larouchepub.com – Mossad Exposed in Phony ‘Palestinian Al-Qaeda’ Caper

 

 

 

 

Menace terroriste avant l’investiture d’Obama ?

 

 C’est en période d’effondrement économique que ressurgit la « menace terroriste ». Alors qu’en Europe semble réémerger une « stratégie de tension » animée par le terrorisme d’ultragauche, Barack Obama « reçoit de nombreux avis inquiétants, émanant de dirigeants des deux côtés de l’Atlantique, de se préparer à une agression terroriste prochaine », écrit le Times de Londres du 15 novembre.

Le Times cite les déclarations récentes du ministre de la Sécurité intérieure britannique, Lord West of Spithead, qui a mis en garde contre « la grande menace » d’Al-Qaida, expliquant qu’« à nouveau, il y a un grand complot qui se prépare, et nous suivons cela de près ». L’article cite aussi un responsable du contre-terrorisme avertissant que le niveau d’alerte terroriste est actuellement au même niveau qu’en juillet 2007 lorsque des bombes avaient explosé dans les transports londoniens. Pour un responsable de la sécurité britannique, Al-Qaida tentera un coup « spectaculaire » pendant la période de transition de l’administration américaine. Et le quotidien britannique écrit qu’« à cause du risque élevé de complot impliquant les vols transatlantiques, la Grande Bretagne et les Etats-Unis partagent tous leurs renseignements sur les activités terroristes soupçonnées ».

Le Times cite également le directeur de la CIA, Michael Hayden, qui lors d’un discours à Washington la semaine dernière, a expliqué qu’« aujourd’hui, les principales menaces terroristes dont mon agence est au courant, sont liées à la zone tribale [de la région frontalière pakistano-afghane, ndlr]. Que ce soit le commandement, le contrôle, l’entraînement, la direction, l’argent, les compétences, tout est lié aux FATA [Federally administered tribal areas, la région tribale pakistanaise, ndlr] (…) s’il y a une attaque majeure sur ce pays, elle portera l’empreinte d’Al Qaeda ».

L’article reprend également les propos d’un expert sur la sécurité au Center for strategic and international studies de Washington (CSIS), expliquant qu’Al Qaeda « pourrait attendre l’investiture d’Obama » avant de frapper, car « pour l’instant les effectifs de police redoublent sur les cibles potentiels, mais ça ne sera plus le cas trois mois après la passation de pouvoir ».

« Quelqu’un prépare une attaque », a dit Lyndon LaRouche en réaction à ces informations, « mais l’idée que ce soit spontané est folle. Ces choses là ne sont pas spontanées. C’est ridicule de penser que s’il y a une attaque ce sera spontané. Ce sera orchestré, et c’est ce que nous voyons ici à l’oeuvre.
« Il n’y a rien de plus approprié pour essayer de cacher l’effondrement financier, que de démobiliser l’opinion populaire en déclenchant une vague de terrorisme. Je dirais qu’en ce moment, l’Empire britannique, avec ses différents pions dans diverses régions du monde, se prépare à déclencher une vague de terrorisme international. Nous sommes dans le genre de période où l’Empire britannique le ferait. On peut donc dire que ces menaces sont réelles, mais reste à savoir d’où elles viennent ?
« Il y a actuellement beaucoup d’idiots dans le monde et si vous les contrôlez, comme le font de nombreux services de renseignement, vous pouvez les amener à perpétrer ces attaques. A mon avis, cette période est propice à ce qu’ils le fassent. »

http://www.solidariteetprogres.org/article4823.html

 

 

 

 

—————————–

—————————–

 

 

The World Must Die So That Israel Can Be Saved

 

 

 

 

By: Peter Chamberlin

 

Bush has failed to fulfill his divine mission, to secure the safety of Israel for all time. For a true believer in Christian-Zionism, it must be gnawing at his soul like some giant rat hollowing-out his insides. How can Jesus ever return if Bush can’t make Jerusalem safe enough for all Jews to return to? If Bush can’t clear the way for the rebuilding of Solomon’s Temple, then where will the messiah sit while he is destroying the earth and most of the Jews with it? (See: “Lobbying for Armageddon”)

http://www.israelenews.com/view.asp?ID=2068

 

Bush has followed his obsession with making the Middle East safe for Israel down every conceivable twist and turn, looking for adequate justification to unleash Armageddon upon the region. He could not overcome Israeli civilian reluctance in 2006 to taste the rain of Hezbollah’s sweet retaliatory revenge of thousands of missiles. No amount of neocon machismo or camaraderie could convince the Israelis in 2006 that American bombers would back them up if Israel escalated its all-out fight to eliminate Hezbollah and Hamas into Syria and Iran.

 

Again, in the recent uproar in Lebanon, Bush the deliverer could not convince Israel to follow through with the planned air assault on Lebanon in the multi-stage plot to restart the war with Hezbollah, http://www.debka.com/article.php?aid=1350 Neither could he persuade them to carry-out the plan to assassinate Hezbollah leader Nasrallah, on April 25. http://www.almanar.com. lb/NewsSite/NewsDetails.aspx?id=43157&language=en http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/cgi-bin/blogs/voices.php/2008/05/08/p25328

 

As a result of the Israeli government’s reluctance to order attacks which would bring massive retaliation upon Israeli citizens, Bush has apparently realized that if he is to eliminate the enemies of Israel in the time allotted him, then he will have to take the bold actions required to protect the “Chosen People” from reasonable retaliation which they bring upon themselves. Towards this end, Bush has employed his loyal Democrat “blue dogs” (three Zionist Jewish Democrats and two Lebanese-Christian Republicans) to introduce legislation that is, in effect, the early stages of a Lebanese war resolution.

 

House Resolution 1194 http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.+Res.+1194:

 

“Urges the United States Government and the international community to immediately take all appropriate actions to support and strengthen the legitimate Government of Lebanon under Prime Minister Fouad Siniora;

…prohibit all air traffic between Iran and Lebanon and between Iran and Syria;

every country controlling possible transit routes from Iran to Lebanon to impose the strictest possible controls on the movement of Iranian vehicles, airplanes, and goods. [which also happens to be Olmert's second option for blockading Iran]

 

http://haaretz.com/hasen/spages/985421.html “Olmert to U.S.: Impose naval blockade on Iran”

 

“Olmert proposed two possible courses of action: first, a naval blockade of Iran using the U.S. fleet to limit the movement in and out of Iran of its merchant ships…The second option Olmert proposed was to place limitations on Iranian aircraft, business people and senior members of the regime at airports throughout the world.”

 

Strangely enough, even though the resolution on Lebanon is intended solely to enforce Israel’s wish list for America’s military, in the minutes of the short forty minute debate on the House floor, http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?r110:H20MY8-0056: Israel was never blamed for any of the problems of the besieged Lebanese democratic state, not even by the two lone opponents of the resolution, Kucinich and Ron Paul. Kucinich, champion of underdogs, did object to the “25 years” of suffering which had been unleashed upon the people of Lebanon, but he never laid the blame for this outrage on its perpetrators, Menachem Begin and Ariel Sharon, or their successors. The Lebanese resistance forces (Hezbollah) which were spawned by Israel’s bloodthirsty invasion which began on June 6,1982 and their Syrian counterparts are blamed for every act of terror and aggression that is committed there by Israel, America and Saudi Arabia.

 

Rep. Gary Ackerman referred to the things we are doing in Lebanon as “the equivalent of a rape,” but he was practicing typical Zionist double-speak, when he attributed the evils wrought by American and Israeli mischief to the opposition forces, who were merely defending against our multiple rapes. He waxed poetic in defense of hypocritical American/Israeli aggression that is always blamed upon the victims or their supporters:

 

“Let us speak out for freedom, speak out for freedom in the case of a people who are under siege [by us], who are in the throes of having their duly elected government taken away from them by terrorist organizations and rogue regimes [who work for us].”

 

According to testimony on H. Res. 1194, by Rep. Kucinich,

 

“David Welch, who went to Lebanon…to basically make sure that the government took a hard-line position and that it would forestall the possibility of any dialogue. And then one of the clients of the United States, or so-called clients, basically escalated the situation by taking on the issue of disarmament of Hezbollah.”

 

The Americans, the Israelis and the Saudis, through Welch, created their own rogue paramilitary (terrorist) forces. According to former head of Israel’s intelligence, Aaron Zeevi Farkash:

 

“Israel has given Lebanese Forces (of Samir Geagea) men the best training and they will appear in any future confrontation. Lebanese Forces fighters will hold on much longer in Hezbollah’s faces, but eventually they will be defeated.” (“Nasrallah Ruined 3Yrs of Arab, Foreign Intel Efforts.”) http://www.almanar.com. lb/NewsSite/NewsDetails.aspx?id=43157&language=en

 

America built the terrorist militias of Saudi front man Saad Hariri’s Future Movement, the destabilizing forces who clumsily tried to provoke Hezbollah into taking over, so that Hezbollah would be responsible for all of Lebanon, justifying the use of the same brutal tactics there that Israel uses in Gaza. http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-security12-2008may12,0,6458359.story The wisdom of Nasrallah is apparent in his decision to restrain the resistance forces, refusing to fall into Bush’s trap, by refusing the bait.

 

In order to reward Saudi loyalty in this affair, for assisting in terror attacks upon Lebanese targets, Bush handed the keys to the nuclear power club to the royal family, along with an oath to:

 

“protect their energy infrastructure against terrorism, as demonstrated by the unsuccessful terrorist attack against the kingdom’s Abqaiq plants in February 2006…safeguarding the kingdom’s energy resources by protecting key infrastructure, enhancing Saudi border security…” http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080516/pl_afp/mideastusdiplomacybushsaudideals [Thus setting the stage for a repeat of the "al Qaida" attacks upon Saudi oil facilities in Abqaiq, Saudi Arabia] http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/02/24/saudi.refinery/index.html

Israel, for their part, has donned its favorite persona of the innocent victim, suffering from America’s Machiavellian policies, as it blames the US for its conflict with Syria. http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/985748.html This attempt to distance the ruling party from the consequences of their actions in Lebanon and the rest of their besieged neighbors is Israeli sleight of hand, masquerading as diplomacy. The new improved Zionist spokesmen are sounding the same alarm in the face of losing control of the Americans, “Israel is the victim, everything is either America or Iran’s fault.”

 

Seeing the rising American backlash to their grand war plans for us, the Zionists have decided to try to “cut bait and run” away from the neocon gambit. Israel has hired Bush to go it alone, as they prepare to return to their favorite time-tested new/old tact, that of the Zionists finishing their theft of the mantle of Judaism, by pretending to be a “light unto the nations,” http://www.lightuntonations.org/ in pursuit of their new world order. Even their American spokesmen, the neocons, have begun to turn against the Israel Lobby, which has been exposed in its manipulations of American government. (See: “We Are All Mearsheimerites Now”) http://www.philipweiss.org/mondoweiss/2008/05/we-are-all-mear.html

 

Olmert’s careless exposure of the web of connections between Israeli politicians and the deep pockets of Jewish American benefactors reveals the river of Jewish-American money that flows through both American and Israeli governments, controlling the lethal actions of each. It is this critical grand exposure that cannot be allowed to happen under any circumstances. However this all works out, it is a certainty that the ruling international financial elite will put a stop to anything that will expose them. (This is why the key to stopping the terror war is to threaten exposure of the ruling cabal. When it becomes impossible for them to pursue their goal of a regional Middle East war from the safety of their dark lairs, they will change their plans.)

 

Under the cover provided by imaginary “good faith” negotiations with half of the Palestinians and equally illusory negotiations with Syria over the Golan Heights, Olmert is able to spin his own reputation and obfuscate the reality that the Zionist controllers cannot allow to be revealed.

http://www.almanar.com.lb/NewsSite/NewsDetails.aspx?id=44167 In the midst of this spinning maelstrom of deception the Zionist settlers annex more Palestinian land to build another 300 homes for the “Chosen People” on the West Bank. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-mideast-homesmar10,1,7070280.story These new projects represent but a small portion of the explosion in settler (colonizer) building that has taken place on Palestinian land since Annapolis created the impression that Israel was becoming reasonable. http://www.peacenow.org.il/data/SIP_STORAGE/files/4/3584.pdf

In the end, this is what it is all about, Zionists exercising what they believe is their “divine right,” to use whatever force is necessary to mercilessly evict the Palestinians from their own homes and sweep them off “Israeli land.” This is also the root of the Lebanese problem that Bush wants to turn into World War III, Zionists plotting to seize the lands they call “Eretz Israel.” This is the part of Zionism’s lies that takes hold of the Christian Zionist movement in America, forcefully creating a restoration of Biblical Israel, the stuff that fuels Bush’s darkest nightmares and delusions.

The military leaders of our beleaguered forces should follow the example of the Lebanese Army as it cooperated with the opposition forces, and begin to undo Bush’s acts of aggression as they are called upon to pull new triggers for him. It is both disgraceful and shocking to see our President and Vice-President crawling on all fours before their Zionist masters, searching for the right trail that will lead to total war on Israel’s enemies! They lust to embroil the world in world war to complete their failed war plans, believing that the survivors will respect them for their wisdom in the end of all things. They have to complete their plot for total power before someone else gains the power to hold them accountable for their crimes against humanity.

http://desertpeace.wordpress.com/2008/05/23/the-world-must-die-so-that-israel-can-be-saved/

France under high surveillance satellite