Archive for the ‘Israel’ Category
Israel is sinking at a very fast speed, new wars coming very soon
Jordanian Professor: Israel Will Go to War over Water
Hezbollah gears up for new war
Fighters rearm and reinforce positions in valleys amid fears that Israel is about to launch attack on Islamic group
Hezbollah is rapidly rearming in preparation for a new conflict with Israel
, fearing that Benjamin Netanyahu’s government will attack Lebanon again prior to any assault on Iran’s nuclear facilities.
Last week, Israeli commandos seized a ship in the Mediterranean loaded with almost 400 tonnes of rockets and small arms – which Israel claimed was being sent from Iran to its Hezbollah allies. In dramatic further evidence of growing tensions, the Observer has learned that Hezbollah fighters have been busy reinforcing fixed defence positions north of the Litani river.
Having lost many of its bunkers in the south, Hezbollah is preparing a new strategy to defend villages there.
Although the organisation denied last week that the weapons were intended for its use, senior commanders have done little to disguise the scale of rearmament. “Sure, we are rearming, we have even said that we have far more rockets and missiles than we did in 2006,” said a Hezbollah commander, speaking on condition of anonymity.
The 2006 war between Hezbollah and Israel began after an ill-advised operation by to kidnap two Israeli soldiers, prompting a massive Israeli response that lasted 34 days and killed more than 1,000 people.
“We had to blow up or leave some of our bunkers and fighting positions, but we still have plenty of capabilities in the south. We expect the Israelis to come soon, if not this winter, then they will wait until spring, when the ground isn’t too soft for their tanks.”
It was expected that the ceasefire would neutralise Hezbollah military efforts along the Lebanon-Israel border, as a newly bolstered United Nations peacekeeping force and the Lebanese army took up positions. Instead, based on dozens of interviews and multiple trips into the country’s south, it is clear that Hezbollah believes it would face different challenges.
It has been forced to abandon the line of deeply entrenched static positions on the border with Israel and withdraw most of its men and weaponry to clusters of Shia villages.
“It’s clear that Hezbollah no longer controls the border, due to the presence of Unifil [United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon] troops,” said Andrew Exum, a military expert on Hezbollah at the Centre for New American Security. “They appear to be hardening the villages for this next round of fighting, while pushing their fixed positions north away from Unifil to protect the approaches to Beirut and the Bekaa Valley.”
Israel and the United States have long assumed that any military action against Iran’s nuclear programme would draw a muscular response from its close allies in Hezbollah. According to Israeli military and intelligence analysts, any move against Iran would require a move first against Hezbollah’s capability to disrupt life in northern Israel with its rockets.
Tel Aviv seems unlikely to commit the same mistakes it did in 2006, when the plan was for air strikes to disrupt and confuse Hezbollah’s military command, while minimising the use of ground troops. Israeli military sources have said that they are preparing for a potential new conflict.
Cruising through the serene green wadis that connect south Lebanon to the Litani river to the north, the commander explains what happened at the end of the last war. “We knocked out three of their tanks on the first day, as they tried to enter,” he explained at a turn-off by the village of al-Qantara. “But after they entered the wadi, we knew they were going for the river and had to be stopped. So we called out to all the special forces anti-tank teams in the area. And they all swarmed the wadi. Boys would set up and wait for the tanks, fire off their rounds and then pull back. Then they would pull back a kilometre or so down the wadi and wait for them again.”
According to Israeli military reports, after the first and last tanks were hit by rocket fire or mines, killing the company commander, the 24 tanks were essentially trapped inside a valley, surrounded on all sides and pinned down by mortars, rockets and mines. Eleven tanks were destroyed and the rest partially damaged and Israel lost at least 12 soldiers.
As unlikely as the Israelis might be to repeat these mistakes, they must figure out how to get their heavy armour past the Hezbollah teams that still lurk in the hills and valleys in the next round of fighting, if and when it comes.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/nov/08/hezbollah-rearms-against-israel
VIA
http://islamic-intelligence.blogspot.com/
//
Joseph Moshe (MOSSAD Microbiologist): “Swine flu vaccine is bioweapon”
Joseph Moshe (MOSSAD Microbiologist): “Swine flu vaccine is bioweapon”
Friday, August 21, 2009
Today, the MSM are not talking about this case any more. Yesterday, they wanted us to believe that Joseph Moshe was a nutcase and a terrorist, arrested for threatening to bomb the White House. Interesting detail about his arrest (the “Westwood standoff”) was that he seemed to be immune to the 5 cans of tear gas and 5 gallons of law-enforcement grade pepper spray they pumped into his face. He very calmly remained in his car, as the video footage of his arrest shows.
Professor Moshe had called into a live radio show by Dr. A. True Ott, broadcast on Republic Broadcasting claiming to be a microbiologist who wanted to supply evidence to a States Attorney regarding tainted H1N1 Swine flu vaccines being produced by Baxter BioPharma Solutions. He said that Baxter’s Ukrainian lab was in fact producing a bioweapon disguised as a vaccine. He claimed that the vaccine contained an adjuvant (additive) designed to weaken the immune system, and replicated RNA from the virus responsible for the 1918 pandemic Spanish flu, causing global sickness and mass death.
Sources tell us that Bar-Joseph Moshe made no threat against the President or the White House. He did not mention any bomb or attack. He then proceeded to inform the White House he intended to go public with this information. When he noticed men in suits in front of his house and feared that the FBI was about to detain him, he packed some belongings into his car and, him being a dual Israeli citizen, tried to reach the Israeli consulate located in close proximity to the federal building where the standoff took place. The FBI and the bomb squad prevented him from reaching it. Who is this man? His profile on biomedexperts.com says he is a plant disease expert with many publications on his name involving the genetic manipulation of virii. Photographic evidence that Moshe is who he says he is can be found here.
Joseph Moshe was soon after his arrest sent or let go to Israel. Nothing has been heard from him since. The Secret Service was not the agency involved in the surveillance of Moshe at his home in California. This was done by the FBI, who had orders to detain or arrest him. Mounted on top of a large black vehicle used in his arrest was a microwave weapon that possibly damaged the electronics in Moshe’s car as well as any communication devices he had which might have been used to contact the media or others who could help him.
Moshe did not suffer the same effects of the gas and pepper spray that others would have because he had built up an immunity to such weapons as a by-product of his Mossad training. Moshe was not handcuffed because he was not placed under arrest.
Does this sound like an insane conspiracy theory? Sure it does. Due to the scarcity and anonimity of the sources we would dismiss it as exactly that, if it weren’t for some uncomfortable facts: Baxter Pharmaceutical has been caught, red-handed, in spreading a live, genetically engineered H5N1 Bird flu vaccine as a lethal biological weapon all over the world, destined to be used for human vaccinations. This happened just a few months ago. And only luck prevented a global catastrophe of epic proportions.
Baxter International Inc. had mixed live, genetically engineered avian flue viruses in vaccine material shipped to 18 countries. Only by sheer luck, a Czech laboratory decided to test the vaccine on a dozen ferrets, which all died in days. The World Health Organization was notified and catastrophe was averted. This was clearly a deliberate act on Baxter’s part, because they adhere to BS3, bio-safety level three. Baxter admitted a “mistake”. Such monumental screwups are totally impossible at that level. Many safety systems would have needed to be sabotaged, many key personell would have needed to be bribed. It simply can’t be done without direction from the inside. They did not send out the wrong vial – they produced dozens of gallons of biological-weapon agent (genetically engineered live H5N1 / Bird flu virus), then sent it out as a “vaccine”.
Baxter knew full well that their vaccine was lethal, because the year before they had tested it on a few hundred homeless Polish people – dozens died as a result.
Where’s the meat? Well – Baxter is now being sued for the deliberate, repeated contamination of vaccines with biological weapons designed – by them – to mass-murder people. Here is the complaint (PDF). By some kook nutcase? Not likely – Jane Burgermeister is an experienced, respected journalist. She is not the only one suing Baxter for planning and executing a plan for global genocide: Other are filing complaints as well. Read a well-researched complaint here (PDF).
Motive? The latter complaint alludes to it. Have you heard of the Georgia Guidestones? An enormous monument loaded with Masonic symbolism costing millions of dollars, it has been erected by unknown, powerful elites (multimillionaires with the clout to erect monuments wherever they please, obviously) around 30 years ago. It gives an “alternative ten commandments”, of which the first is the extermination of six and a half billion people from the face of the Earth. Half a billion will remain. This is the number of people the planet can sustain indefinitely, so that the descendents of the Rothschilds and Rockefellers can live in peace and affluence indefinitely. Slaves are needed to produce that luxury, but 500 million will do just fine. But how does one go about killing off most of the world?
“Vaccinating” the planet with a bioweapon with near-100% mortality would do the trick. Baxter would provide both the bioweapon as well as the vaccine against it to “civilized” Western peoples. Result: We can plunder Africa, we have no more competition from SE Asia, the oil is for our taking and only Western and perhaps Chinese sheeple remain.
Rockefeller said this in 1994 at a U.N. dinner: “We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis, and the nations will accept the New World Order.” PNAC said something similar right before 9/11.
Board of Directors of Baxter International Inc.
Walter E. Boomer
Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Rogers Corporation
Blake E. Devitt
Former Senior Audit Partner and Director Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Industry Practice, Ernst & Young LLP
John D. Forsyth
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield
Gail D. Fosler
President, The Conference Board
James R. Gavin III, M.D., Ph.D.
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Medical Officer, Healing Our Village, Inc.
Peter S. Hellman
Former President, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer, Nordson Corporation
Wayne T. Hockmeyer, Ph.D.
Founder and Former Chairman of the Board, MedImmune, Inc.
Joseph B. Martin, M.D., Ph.D.
Professor of Neurobiology and Former Dean of the Faculty of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
Robert L. Parkinson, Jr.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Baxter International Inc.
Carole J. Shapazian
Former Executive Vice President, Maytag Corporation
Thomas T. Stallkamp
Industrial Partner, Ripplewood Holdings LLC
K. J. Storm
Former Chairman of the Executive Board, AEGON N.V. (The Netherlands)
Albert P.L. Stroucken
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Owens-Illinois, Inc.
Executive Officers
Joy A. Amundson
Corporate Vice President – President, BioScience
Peter J. Arduini
Corporate Vice President – President, Medication Delivery
Robert M. Davis
Corporate Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
J. Michael Gatling
Corporate Vice President – Manufacturing
Jeanne K. Mason
Corporate Vice President – Human Resources
Bruce McGillivray
Corporate Vice President – President, Renal
Robert L. Parkinson, Jr.
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President
Norbert G. Riedel
Corporate Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer
David P. Scharf
Corporate Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Karenann Terrell
Corporate Vice President and Chief Information Officer
Cheryl L. White
Corporate Vice President – Quality
Corporate Officers
Carlos Alonso
Corporate Vice President — President, Latin America
Michael J. Baughman
Corporate Vice President and Controller
Robert J. Hombach
Corporate Vice President and Treasurer
Gerald Lema
Corporate Vice President – President, Asia Pacific
Peter Nicklin Corporate Vice President – President, Europe
France under Zion occupation
France under Zion occupation
A question to French defence minister about the killing of a High officer policeman in Paris by a French Zionist who belong to French zion militia (LDJ, BETAR). This man is free, he killed a Palestinian taxi in tel-aviv. That’s the world we live in.
ПЕСНЬ ПАРТИЗАН
(слова и музыка Анны Смирновой-Марли)
От леса до леса
Дорога идет
Вдоль обрыва,
А там высоко
Где-то месяц плывёт
Торопливо…
Пойдём мы туда,
Куда ворон не влетит,
Зверь не входит,
Никто, никакая сила
Нас не покорит,
Не отгонит!
Народные мстители,
Мы отобьем
Злую силу,
Пусть ветер свободы
Засыпет
И нашу могилу…
Пойдем мы туда
И разрушим до конца
Вражьи сети,
Пусть знают как много
За правду нас легло
Наши дети!…
1942 год
——————
LE CHANT DES PARTISANS
(Chant de la Libération)
(Paroles de Maurice Druon et Joseph Kessel
Musique d’Anna Marly)
(слова – Морис Дрюон, Жозеф Кессель,
музыка – Анна Смирнова-Марли)
Ami, entends-tu
Le vol noir des corbeaux
Sur nos plaines?
Ami, entends-tu
Les cris sourds du pays
Qu’on enchaîne?
Ohé! partisans,
Ouvriers et paysans,
C’est l’alarme!
Ce soir l’ennemi
Connaîtra le prix du sang
Et des larmes!
Montez de la mine,
Descendez des collines,
Camarades!
Sortez de la paille
Les fusils, la mitraille,
Les grenades…
Ohé! les tueurs,
A la balle et au couteau,
Tuez vite!
Ohé! saboteur,
Attention à ton fardeau:
Dynamite!
C’est nous qui brisons
Les barreaux des prisons
Pour nos frères,
La haine à nos trousses
Et la faim qui nous pousse,
La misère…
Il y a des pays
Ou les gens au creux de lits
Font des rêves;
Ici, nous, vois-tu,
Nous on marche et nous on tue,
Nous on crève.
Ici chacun sait
Ce qu’il veut, ce qui’il fait
Quand il passe…
Ami, si tu tombes
Un ami sort de l’ombre
A ta place.
Demain du sang noir
Séchera au grand soleil
Sur les routes.
Sifflez, compagnons,
Dans la nuit la Liberté
Nous écoute…
Top Things you Think You Know about Iran that are not True
Top Things you Think You Know about Iran that are not True
Thursday is a fateful day for the world, as the US, other members of the United Nations Security Council, and Germany meet in Geneva with Iran in a bid to resolve outstanding issues. Although Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had earlier attempted to put the nuclear issue off the bargaining table, this rhetorical flourish was a mere opening gambit and nuclear issues will certainly dominate the talks. As Henry Kissinger pointed out, these talks are just beginning and there are highly unlikely to be any breakthroughs for a very long time. Diplomacy is a marathon, not a sprint.
But on this occasion, I thought I’d take the opportunity to list some things that people tend to think they know about Iran, but for which the evidence is shaky.
Belief: Iran is aggressive and has threatened to attack Israel, its neighbors or the US
Reality: Iran has not launched an aggressive war modern history (unlike the US or Israel), and its leaders have a doctrine of “no first strike.” This is true of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, as well as of Revolutionary Guards commanders.
Belief: Iran is a militarized society bristling with dangerous weapons and a growing threat to world peace.
Reality: Iran’s military budget is a little over $6 billion annually. Sweden, Singapore and Greece all have larger military budgets. Moreover, Iran is a country of 70 million, so that its per capita spending on defense is tiny compared to these others, since they are much smaller countries with regard to population. Iran spends less per capita on its military than any other country in the Persian Gulf region with the exception of the United Arab Emirates.
Belief: Iran has threatened to attack Israel militarily and to “wipe it off the map.”
Reality: No Iranian leader in the executive has threatened an aggressive act of war on Israel, since this would contradict the doctrine of ‘no first strike’ to which the country has adhered. The Iranian president has explicitly said that Iran is not a threat to any country, including Israel.
Belief: But didn’t President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad threaten to ‘wipe Israel off the map?’
Reality: President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad did quote Ayatollah Khomeini to the effect that “this Occupation regime over Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time” (in rezhim-e eshghalgar-i Qods bayad as safheh-e ruzgar mahv shavad). This was not a pledge to roll tanks and invade or to launch missiles, however. It is the expression of a hope that the regime will collapse, just as the Soviet Union did. It is not a threat to kill anyone at all.
Belief: But aren’t Iranians Holocaust deniers?
Actuality: Some are, some aren’t. Former president Mohammad Khatami has castigated Ahmadinejad for questioning the full extent of the Holocaust, which he called “the crime of Nazism.” Many educated Iranians in the regime are perfectly aware of the horrors of the Holocaust. In any case, despite what propagandists imply, neither Holocaust denial (as wicked as that is) nor calling Israel names is the same thing as pledging to attack it militarily.
Belief: Iran is like North Korea in having an active nuclear weapons program, and is the same sort of threat to the world.
Actuality: Iran has a nuclear enrichment site at Natanz near Isfahan where it says it is trying to produce fuel for future civilian nuclear reactors to generate electricity. All Iranian leaders deny that this site is for weapons production, and the International Atomic Energy Agency has repeatedly inspected it and found no weapons program. Iran is not being completely transparent, generating some doubts, but all the evidence the IAEA and the CIA can gather points to there not being a weapons program. The 2007 National Intelligence Estimate by 16 US intelligence agencies, including the CIA and the Defense Intelligence Agency, assessed with fair confidence that Iran has no nuclear weapons research program. This assessment was based on debriefings of defecting nuclear scientists, as well as on the documents they brought out, in addition to US signals intelligence from Iran. While Germany, Israel and recently the UK intelligence is more suspicious of Iranian intentions, all of them were badly wrong about Iraq’s alleged Weapons of Mass Destruction and Germany in particular was taken in by Curveball, a drunk Iraqi braggart.
Belief: The West recently discovered a secret Iranian nuclear weapons plant in a mountain near Qom.
Actuality: Iran announced Monday a week ago to the International Atomic Energy Agency that it had begun work on a second, civilian nuclear enrichment facility near Qom. There are no nuclear materials at the site and it has not gone hot, so technically Iran is not in violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, though it did break its word to the IAEA that it would immediately inform the UN of any work on a new facility. Iran has pledged to allow the site to be inspected regularly by the IAEA, and if it honors the pledge, as it largely has at the Natanz plant, then Iran cannot produce nuclear weapons at the site, since that would be detected by the inspectors. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton admitted on Sunday that Iran could not produce nuclear weapons at Natanz precisely because it is being inspected. Yet American hawks have repeatedly demanded a strike on Natanz.
Belief: The world should sanction Iran not only because of its nuclear enrichment research program but also because the current regime stole June’s presidential election and brutally repressed the subsequent demonstrations.
Actuality: Iran’s reform movement is dead set against increased sanctions on Iran, which likely would not affect the regime, and would harm ordinary Iranians.
Belief: Isn’t the Iranian regime irrational and crazed, so that a doctrine of mutally assured destruction just would not work with them?
Actuality: Iranian politicians are rational actors. If they were madmen, why haven’t they invaded any of their neighbors? Saddam Hussein of Iraq invaded both Iran and Kuwait. Israel invaded its neighbors more than once. In contrast, Iran has not started any wars. Demonizing people by calling them unbalanced is an old propaganda trick. The US elite was once unalterably opposed to China having nuclear science because they believed the Chinese are intrinsically irrational. This kind of talk is a form of racism.
Belief: The international community would not have put sanctions on Iran, and would not be so worried, if it were not a gathering nuclear threat.
Actuality: The centrifuge technology that Iran is using to enrich uranium is open-ended. In the old days, you could tell which countries might want a nuclear bomb by whether they were building light water reactors (unsuitable for bomb-making) or heavy-water reactors (could be used to make a bomb). But with centrifuges, once you can enrich to 5% to fuel a civilian reactor, you could theoretically feed the material back through many times and enrich to 90% for a bomb. However, as long as centrifuge plants are being actively inspected, they cannot be used to make a bomb. The two danger signals would be if Iran threw out the inspectors or if it found a way to create a secret facility. The latter task would be extremely difficult, however, as demonstrated by the CIA’s discovery of the Qom facility construction in 2006 from satellite photos. Nuclear installations, especially centrifuge ones, consume a great deal of water, construction materiel, and so forth, so that constructing one in secret is a tall order. In any case, you can’t attack and destroy a country because you have an intuition that they might be doing something illegal. You need some kind of proof. Moreover, Israel, Pakistan and India are all much worse citizens of the globe than Iran, since they refused to sign the NPT and then went for broke to get a bomb; and nothing at all has been done to any of them by the UNSC.
http://www.juancole.com/2009/10/top-things-you-think-you-know-about.html
Dix fausses croyances sur l’Iran, par Juan Cole
Dans le dossier sur l’Iran publié par le Monde cette semaine, on pouvait lire que ce pays représentait une « menace stratégique majeure ». De fait, le budget militaire de Téhéran est inférieur à celui de la Suède. Le président de la République ne manque pas de rappeler régulièrement qu’Amadinejad a menacé de « rayer de la carte » Israël. Il n’a pourtant jamais prononcé cette phrase, mais uniquement émis le souhait que le « régime sioniste » quitte la scène de l’histoire. A l’image de ces deux affirmations largement reprises par les médias et certains politiques, le dossier iranien est l’objet de tous les fantasmes, de toutes les exagérations – et parfois de manipulations. Pourtant, au moment où s’ouvrent enfin des négociations, il convient plus que jamais de savoir raison garder, et de ne pas tomber dans la caricature. L’universitaire Juan Cole passe au crible dix assertions sur l’Iran.
Par Juan Cole, Informed Comment, 1er octobre 2009
Ce jeudi est une journée historique, marquée par le début des rencontres à Genève entre L’Iran, les États-Unis, l’Allemagne et les autres membres du Conseil de Sécurité des Nations unies pour tenter de résoudre les questions en suspens. Bien que le président iranien Mahmoud Ahmadinejad ait auparavant tenté d’exclure la question nucléaire de la table de négociation, cette posture était au plus une diversion, et les questions nucléaires vont certainement dominer les discussions. Comme l’a souligné Henry Kissinger, ces négociations ne font que commencer et il est très peu probable qu’elles connaissent des avancées avant longtemps. La diplomatie est un marathon, pas un sprint.
En cette occasion, je crois qu’il est utile d’établir une liste de convictions répandues au sujet de l’Iran dont le bien fondé est discutable.
Conviction : l’Iran est un pays agressif qui a menacé d’attaquer Israël, ses voisins ou les Etats-Unis
Réalité : L’Iran n’a pas déclenché de guerre d’agression durant l’histoire contemporaine (contrairement aux États-Unis ou Israël), et ses dirigeants ont une doctrine de « non première frappe. » Cela est vrai pour le guide suprême Ali Khamenei, ainsi que pour les commandants des Gardiens de la Révolution.
Conviction : l’Iran est une société militarisée, bardée d’armes dangereuses, qui représentante une menace croissante pour la paix mondiale.
Réalité : Le budget militaire de l’Iran est d’un peu plus de 6 milliards de dollars par an. La Suède, Singapour et la Grèce ont tous des budgets militaires supérieurs. En outre, l’Iran est un pays de 70 millions d’habitants, de sorte que ses dépenses militaires par habitant sont infimes par rapport à ces exemples qui sont des pays dont la population est bien moins nombreuse. L’Iran dépense moins par habitant pour son armée que n’importe quel autre pays de la région du golfe Persique, à l’exception des Émirats Arabes Unis.
Conviction : l’Iran a menacé d’attaquer Israël militairement et de le « rayer de la carte. »
Réalité : Aucun dirigeant appartenant au gouvernement iranien n’à menacé Israël d’un acte de guerre. Cela serait en contradiction avec la doctrine de « non première frappe » à laquelle le pays adhère. Le président iranien a explicitement déclaré que l’Iran ne menace aucun pays, y compris Israël.
Conviction : Le président Mahmoud Ahmadinejad n’a-t-il pas menacé de « rayer Israël de la carte » ?
Réalité : Le président Mahmoud Ahmadinejad a cité l’ayatollah Khomeini en déclarant que « ce régime d’occupation à Jérusalem doit disparaître de la page du temps » (en rezhim-e eshghalgar-Qods i bayad comme safheh-e mahv Rüzgar shavad). Ce n’était pas la promesse d’une invasion de chars ou d’une frappe de missiles. C’est l’expression de l’espoir que le régime va s’effondrer, tout comme l’avait fait l’Union soviétique. Ce n’est pas du tout une menace de tuer quiconque.
Conviction : Les Iraniens ne sont-ils pas négationnistes ?
Faits : Certains le sont, d’autres non. L’ancien président Mohammad Khatami a fustigé Ahmadinejad pour s’être interrogé sur l’Holocauste, et l’a qualifié de « crime du nazisme ». Parmi les instances du régime, de nombreuses personnes cultivées ont parfaitement conscience des horreurs de l’Holocauste. En tout cas, malgré ce que les propagandistes indiquent, ni le déni de l’Holocauste (aussi pervers soit-il), ni les injures envers Israël ne sont la même chose que la volonté d’attaquer militairement.
Conviction : l’Iran ressemble à la Corée du Nord par son programme nucléaire militaire, et représente le même genre de menace pour le monde.
Faits : L’Iran dispose un site d’enrichissement d’uranium à Natanz près d’Ispahan, où il affirme vouloir produire du combustible pour les futurs réacteurs nucléaires civils destinés à la production d’électricité. Tous les dirigeants iraniens nient que ce site soit destiné à la production d’armes, et l’Agence Internationale de l’Energie Atomique l’a inspecté à plusieurs reprises et n’a détecté aucun programme militaire. Le fait que l’Iran ne soit pas totalement transparent, donne naissance à quelques doutes, mais tous les éléments de preuve réunis par l’AIEA et la CIA indiquent une absence de programme militaire. L’édition 2007 du National Intelligence Estimate, rédigé par 16 agences de renseignement américaines, dont la CIA et la Defense Intelligence Agency, a évalué en confiance que l’Iran n’avait pas de programme d’armement nucléaire. Cette évaluation était basée sur des entrevues avec des scientifiques du nucléaire ayant fait défection, ainsi que sur les documents qu’ils avaient emportés, et sur l’espionnage des communications en Iran. L’Allemagne, Israël et récemment les services Britanniques de renseignement sont plus soupçonneux quant aux intentions iraniennes. Mais l’ensemble de ces services se sont lourdement trompés sur les présumées armes irakiennes de destruction massive et l’Allemagne en particulier avait été abusée par les vantardises d’un ivrogne irakien dont le nom de code était « Curveball ».
Croyance : L’Occident a récemment découvert une usine secrète iranienne d’armement nucléaire située sous une montagne près de Qom.
Faits : L’Iran a annoncé lundi dernier à l’Agence Internationale de l’Energie Atomique qu’elle avait commencé à construire une seconde installation civile d’enrichissement d’uranium à proximité de Qom. Il n’y a pas de matières nucléaires sur ce site et il n’est pas en service, l’Iran n’est donc pas techniquement en violation du Traité de non-prolifération nucléaire, bien qu’il ait rompu l’engagement pris avec l’AIEA d’informer immédiatement l’ONU de toute réalisation d’une nouvelle installation. L’Iran s’est engagé à autoriser que ce site soit inspecté régulièrement par l’AIEA, et s’il honore cette promesse, comme il l’a fait en grande partie à l’usine de Natanz, l’Iran ne pourra pas produire d’armes nucléaires sur ce site, car cela serait détecté par les inspecteurs. La Secrétaire d’État Hillary Clinton a admis dimanche que l’Iran ne pouvait pas produire d’armes nucléaires à Natanz, précisément parce que ce site est inspecté. Pourtant, les faucons américains ont demandé à plusieurs reprises une frappe sur Natanz.
Croyance : La communauté internationale devrait sanctionner l’Iran non seulement à cause de son programme d’enrichissement nucléaire, mais aussi parce que le régime actuel a volé l’élection présidentielle de juin et brutalement réprimé les manifestations qui ont suivi.
Actualité : Le mouvement réformateur en Iran est farouchement opposé à l’imposition de sanctions renforcées contre l’Iran, qui n’auraient probablement pas d’effet sur le régime, mais affecteraient les Iraniens ordinaires.
Croyance : Le régime iranien n’est-il pas irrationnel et dément, de sorte que la doctrine de la destruction mutuellement assurée ne pourrait pas s’appliquer dans ce cas ?
Actualité : les hommes politiques iraniens sont des acteurs rationnels. S’il s’agissait de fous, pourquoi n’ont-ils pas envahi l’un de leurs voisins ? L’irakien Saddam Hussein a envahi l’Iran et le Koweït. Israël a envahi ses voisins plus d’une fois. En revanche, l’Iran n’a jamais déclenché de guerre. Diaboliser ses adversaires en les qualifiant de déséquilibrés est un vieil artifice de propagande. Les élites américaines étaient autrefois totalement opposées à ce que la Chine accède au savoir nucléaire parce qu’elles croyaient que les Chinois sont intrinsèquement irrationnels. Ce type de discours est une forme de racisme.
Croyance : La communauté internationale n’aurait pas à imposer des sanctions contre l’Iran et ne serait pas si inquiète si ce pays ne posait pas une menace nucléaire grandissante.
Faits : La technologie de centrifugation que l’Iran utilise pour enrichir l’uranium n’est pas à usage unique. Auparavant, on pouvait déterminer quels étaient les pays qui pouvaient vouloir acquérir la bombe nucléaire selon qu’ils entreprenaient la construction de réacteurs à eau légère (impropre à la fabrication de bombes) ou de réacteurs à eau lourde (qui pouvaient être utilisés pour fabriquer une bombe). Mais avec les centrifugeuses, lorsque l’on parvient à enrichir l’uranium à 5% pour alimenter un réacteur civil, on peut théoriquement recycler le matériau de nombreuses fois et l’enrichir jusqu’aux 90% requis pour une bombe. Toutefois, aussi longtemps que des usines de centrifugation sont activement inspectées, elles ne peuvent pas être utilisées pour fabriquer une arme. Le danger proviendrait du fait que l’Iran expulse les inspecteurs ou qu’il parvienne à bâtir une installation secrète. Cette dernière tâche sera extrêmement difficile, toutefois, comme en témoigne la découverte par la CIA de la construction de l’installation Qom en 2006 grâce à des photos satellites. Les installations nucléaires, en particulier les centrifugeuses, consomment une grande quantité d’eau, de matériel de construction, et ainsi de suite, de sorte qu’en construire une en secret n’est pas chose aisée.
En tout cas, on ne peut pas attaquer et bombarder un pays sur la simple suspicion d’une activité illicite. On doit disposer d’une forme de preuve. Par ailleurs, Israël, le Pakistan et l’Inde sont des membres de la communauté internationale plus condamnables que l’Iran, car ces pays ont refusé de signer le TNP et ont ensuite tout fait pour obtenir une bombe. Malgré cela, rien n’a été entrepris contre aucun d’entre eux par le Conseil de Sécurité des Nations Unies.
http://contreinfo.info/article.php3?id_article=2824
Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan are israelis wars waged by their american puppets and european slaves
Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan are israelis wars waged by their american puppets and european slaves
War criminals and brainmasters of 9/11, Netanyahu and BarakEhud Barak – Architect of 9-11
The terror attacks of 9-11 were planned and carried out by Zionist extremists with the intention that the blame would be assigned to Islamic terrorists based in Afghanistan. Israeli military leaders and the Zionist-controlled media were well prepared to interpret the attacks so that public opinion would blame Muslims and Arabs for the atrocity. Changing public opinion is the primary mission of the architects of false-flag terrorism.
The evidence, however, indicates that the terror atrocity of 9-11 was not carried out by Osama Bin Laden, Al Qaida, the Taliban, or any Muslim entity. The discovery of chips of nano-thermite in the dust of the demolished World Trade Center has fully exposed the official version, promoted by the controlled media for eight years, as nothing but a pack of lies. Whoever applied tons of super-thermite to the Twin Towers had unrestricted access to every floor of the buildings – and state of the art nano-technology explosives. This was certainly not Osama Bin Laden and his gang of twenty.
Thousands of American, Afghani, and Iraqi lives have been lost as a result of the false understanding of 9-11, and the map of the Middle East has been redrawn. This is intentional, of course, and the Zionist-controlled media has been the most important supporter of the lies that surround 9-11. In the United States, the false interpretation of 9-11 has been vigorously promoted by Rupert Murdoch’s FOX News and News Corporation, CNN/Time Warner, the New York Times, and other Zionist-controlled news networks.
The lies about 9-11 were prepared in advance to kick-start a U.S.-led military campaign across the Middle East that would result in American troops being permanently based across the region to support the fortress state of Israel and its Zionist hegemony. This is what is called the “War on Terror,” which has been the Israeli plan since the mid-1980s, as articulated by Israel’s current prime minister from the far-right Likud party, Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu. This extreme Zionist strategy became U.S. policy in the aftermath of 9-11. It was planned that way, of course.
The invasion of Afghanistan, the response of President George W. Bush to 9-11, has been called “Obama’s war” because of President Barack Obama’s escalation of the nearly eight-year-old war of occupation. Despite the discovery of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center, Obama continues to push the war in Afghanistan as a response to 9-11: “Let us renew our resolve against those who perpetrated this barbaric act and plot against us still,” Obama said at the Pentagon’s eighth anniversary ceremony. “In pursuit of al Qaeda and its extremist allies we will never falter,” he said.
The war in Afghanistan, begun on 7 October 2001, cannot rightly be called Obama’s war. It can, however, be called “Barak’s war” if we mean Ehud Barak, the current Israeli defense minister and former prime minister. Barak was the first person to call for a U.S. war against Afghanistan and the chief architect of 9-11. By being the first to interpret the attacks and articulate the desired response, Barak revealed his role as a chief architect of 9-11.
The false-flag terrorist troika: Shimon Peres, Bibi Netanyahu, and Ehud Barak
The Israeli leaders Benjamin Netanyahu and Ehud Barak were among the very first people to blame Osama Bin Laden for 9-11 and call for military action against the Taliban-led regime in Afghanistan. The false-flag attacks were designed and then used by these Israeli leaders to start their long-planned “War on Terror,” an Israeli military strategy pushed by Netanyahu for many years. The U.S. military presence in Afghanistan and Iraq allows Israel to carry out covert murderous false-flag terror operations in these beleaguered nations, acts that are effectively disguised as “sectarian” violence by the Zionist-controlled media.
It needs to be understood that Israel is, unlike any Western nation, a state that is run by the military. It is often said in Israel that while some of the Zionists wanted Athens, they got Sparta. The Israeli military/security establishment dominates the political affairs of the nation and has done so for decades. Seven of Israel’s sixteen defense ministers, for example, were also serving as prime ministers. Four of them, Moshe Dayan, Yitzhak Rabin, Ehud Barak, and Shaul Mofaz, also served as Chief of Staff of the military. This is essential to understanding Ehud Barak’s key role in 9-11.
Ehud Barak, the current defense minister, was both prime minister and defense minister of Israel from 1999 until March 2001. As defense minister, Barak led the criminal aggression known as Operation Cast Lead against the civilian population of Gaza from December 2008 through January 2009. Although Israeli forces under Barak’s command committed egregious war crimes in Gaza, neither Israel nor Ehud Barak has been held accountable by the international community. The Israeli military, for example, flagrantly used banned white phosphorous bombs on the civilian population and intentionally bombed an American-run school and U.N. compound. The Israeli assault killed some 1,300 civilians.
Just this week, defense minister Barak approved the building of some 500 housing units on illegally occupied Palestinian land without a word of protest from the administration of Barack Obama, which has openly demanded an end to illegal Zionist construction in the occupied territories. The position taken by the Obama administration is, however, merely a false front meant to placate Arab states and public concerns about Israeli crimes in Palestine. In the same way, president-elect Obama said he would have plenty to say about Israeli war crimes committed in Gaza after he was inaugurated. He has, however, been completely silent about Israeli war crimes.
EHUD BARAK AND 9-11
Ehud Barak is a chief architect of 9-11. As Israel’s highest military strategist in political office, his role in the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11 was at the highest architectural level. As the Israeli prime minister and defense minister from 1999 through March 2001, Barak was at the top of Israel’s political and military establishment when the false-flag terror attack was being prepared. Although Barak was replaced as prime minister by Ariel Sharon six months before 9-11, the project had been planned and was set to go before Barak left office. Barak was given a high-paying position with Electronic Data Systems, an American company, only hours before the 9-11 attacks. Israeli crimes like 9-11 and the murder of President John F. Kennedy are planned well in advance and compartmentalized for operation security.
Outside observers were surprised when the extremely hawkish right-wing Likud prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu took Barak, head of the Labor party, as his defense minister. The key fact to be considered in this relationship is that Barak was Netanyahu’s commanding officer when they were both active in Israel’s elite commando force, the Sayeret Matkal.
Ehud Barak was Netanyahu’s commanding officer in the Sayeret Matkal. Here they attend a June 2009 memorial ceremony for Netanyahu’s brother who died in the Entebbe operation headed by Barak.
Barak is known for heading the military response to the 1972 hijacking of a Sabena Airlines jet, which was forced by four terrorists to land at Israel’s Lod Airport outside Tel Aviv. Barak led a team of Sayeret commandos, dressed in mechanics’ overalls, which approached the plane as if to refuel it and then stormed inside. Barak’s commandos overpowered the hijackers and rescued the passengers. One of the men under Barak’s command was Benjamin Netanyahu. “Bibi was a good young officer,” Barak acknowledged to Serge Schmemann of the New York Times (May 21, 1996), referring to Netanyahu by his nickname. “I tried to convince him to stay in the army longer. He was good at that, but that does not make him an appropriate [person] to run the country.”
Barak was the key architect of the June 1976 Operation Entebbe, another rescue mission to free the hostages of the Air France aircraft hijacked by terrorists and forced to land at the Entebbe Airport in Uganda. Netanyahu’s brother, Yonatan, was killed in this raid. An Israeli school of terrorism was created in his name. The relationship between Barak, the commander, and Netanyahu, the soldier, is very close. These men have worked as a team for decades.
BARAK INTERPRETS 9-11
In the immediate aftermath of 9-11, Ehud Barak, the former Israeli prime/defense minister, was the first person to call for the U.S. to attack Afghanistan. On the very day of the attacks Barak told Rupert Murdoch’s Sky Television that Western governments needed to make a concerted effort to combat terrorism: “Most obviously my guess is a bin Laden organization…We have to stand firm against such terrorism,” Barak said. “We have to coordinate to launch the same kind of fight that our forefathers gave to the fight against piracy on the high seas – mainly terrorists should not be allowed to land at any port or airport,” he said. Note Barak’s use of the pronoun “our.” Whose forefathers is he talking about?
“The leadership of the world should be able to take action. It is time for action. The world is not going to be the same place as before,” Barak said.
“Bin Laden sits in Afghanistan,” Barak said on 9-11. “We know where the terror sites are. It’s time for action.” Barak’s comments were reported in the Washington Times of 12 September 2001.
Netanyahu and Barak are very close in planning top-secret operations.
Benjamin Netanyahu, another former Israeli prime minister, actually told the New York Times that the terror attacks were “very good” for U.S.-Israeli relations on 9-11. He also “called upon all democratic nations of the world to join an international coalition to crush the terrorist organizations and the regimes that sponsor them,” according to the Jerusalem Post of 12 September 2001. This military response is the pre-planned Israeli strategy known as the “War on Terror,” which Netanyahu has been pushing since 1986 in his books, articles, and speeches.
The Jerusalem Post of September 12, 2001, reported:
“We must build a coalition against terror today, when our power is unmatched, because tomorrow it could be matched,” Netanyahu said in a news conference at Jerusalem’s King David Hotel. “It’s time to take on militant Islamic regimes with a great deal of strength. We should crush the terrorist infrastructure that threatens the entire free world.”
Netanyahu predicted that yesterday would be a turning point in the history of the United States, similar to Pearl Harbor. He called upon the United States to lead the effort against “the Bin Ladens, Arafats, and Saddam Husseins of the world.”
The former prime minister said he predicted massive attacks on the World Trade Center shortly after the last attack on the building, and in his 1995 book Fighting Terrorism.
Barak was ready with an editorial entitled “Democratic unity is the only answer to terrorism,” published in The Times of London on 13 September 2001:
Terrorism has declared war on the free world and the free world must unite to fight back. This is the inevitable conclusion to be drawn from the horror of Tuesday’s attack. Just as the enlightened world mobilised in the past to combat challenges to its core values, so must such an international coalition be built today …
Let there be no illusions. This attack is an attack on everything that Western civilisation holds dear — freedom, the rule of law, the sanctity of human life. It is an attack on the open manner in which business is conducted between people and nations and on the very fabric of human interaction as we know it.
And we know who the attackers are. Whether Osama bin Laden was involved directly or not, or whether it was another grouping, the world’s governments know exactly who the terrorists are and exactly which rogue states support and promote their activity. Countries like Iran, Iraq, Libya, Sudan and North Korea have a proven track-record of sponsoring terrorism, while no one needs reminding of the carnage wrought by the terrorist thugs of Hamas, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad and even Yassir Arafat’s own PLO. The lines of battle are clearly drawn.
Ehud Barak certainly knows who “the attackers are.” He sees the chief architect of 9-11 every time he looks in the mirror.
As an architect of the terror atrocity of 9-11, Barak was well prepared to explain what happened to the Twin Towers.
Putin: Russia opposes force, sanctions on Iran
Putin: Russia opposes force, sanctions on Iran
By VLADIMIR ISACHENKOV (AP)
NOVO-OGARYOVO, Russia — Russia’s prime minister warned Friday against using force or new sanctions against Iran for its defiance over its nuclear program, saying Moscow has no evidence that Tehran is seeking nuclear arms.
Iran has refused to provide the international community with details of its nuclear activities, which the United States and other nations say are aimed at developing weapons.
Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin said, however, that Moscow has “no grounds to doubt” Iran’s claim that its nuclear program is purely peaceful, his spokesman Dmitry Peskov said.
Putin said, according to Peskov, that “any use of force, delivering any kind of strike, won’t help, won’t solve the problem. On the contrary, it will hurt the entire region. As for sanctions, they won’t bring the desired effect.”
Putin was speaking at a meeting of foreign experts on Russia.
According to other meeting participants, Putin also said Russia does not want to see a nuclear-armed Iran, and that Iran needs to answer international concerns about its activities.
Russia, which is building a nuclear power plant in Iran, has made similar comments in the past, and has repeatedly warned against any attack on Iran.
But Putin’s remarks Friday could disappoint U.S. and Israeli officials, who have urged the Kremlin to put more pressure on Iran.
Participants in the meeting said Putin dodged a question about media reports that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu secretly visited Moscow this week, including speculation that Netanyahu wanted to warn Russia of an impending strike against Iranian nuclear facilities.
Kremlin spokesman Alexei Pavlov said he had “no information” that Netanyahu was in Moscow, but Russian officials have stopped short of outright denying the visit took place.
The United States and European allies have given Iran until the end of September to take up an offer of nuclear talks with six world powers — including Russia — and trade incentives should it suspend uranium enrichment activities. It has already defied three sets of U.N. Security Council sanctions since 2006 for its refusal to freeze uranium enrichment.
Russia, which holds veto power on the U.N. Security Council, backed those sanctions but used its clout to water down tougher U.S. proposals. Russian officials have said too much pressure would be counterproductive.
This week, Iran offered a counterproposal for new wide-ranging negotiations, but provided no details of its nuclear program, according to a copy published by an investigative group.
U.S. officials have said the Iranian proposal falls short of satisfying international demands, but Russian media have suggested Moscow was less critical. According to Ekho Moskvy radio, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said Thursday that Iran’s proposal included worthwhile elements and could be worked with.
Copyright © 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iBLHJGdHUD5xKiB9QYH6NlZhfTXgD9AL62R00
Russian report: Netanyahu may be planning attack
Russian report: Netanyahu may be planning attack
PM’s rushed visit to Moscow under cloud of secrecy occupies Russian media. Kommersant paper quotes ‘informed Israeli’ source as saying ‘It can’t be ruled out that Israel may be ready to move on to decisive actions with regards to Iran, and Netanyahu decided to inform Kremlin of this’
Olga Gouresky
| // Russian media on Thursday continued to cover Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s mysterious visit to Moscow, that was leaked to the media from his office.
Kommersant newspaper quoted “experts” as saying they believe a visit of this kind could have stemmed from urgent circumstances, “for example, in the event that Israel plans to attack Iran”.
At first, Moscow denied a visit ever took place, but after Netanyahu’s office was forced to admit to the PM’s Military Secretary Meir Kalifi’s lie, a senior Kremlin source also confirmed to Kommersant that the Israeli prime minister did indeed visit the city. Russian media also directed questions on the visit to the Israeli embassy in Moscow, but embassy sources said that if there was such a visit, “We know nothing about it.” The paper then quoted what it called an “informed” Israeli source, who wished to remain anonymous, as saying, “Such a visit could be related to new information and could threaten the Iranian nuclear program. It should not be ruled out that Israel may be ready to move on to decisive actions with regards to Iran, and Netanyahu has decided to inform the Kremlin of this.” Russian Foreign Minister Spokesman Andrei Nesterenko published an announcement saying, “We have no knowledge of a Netanyahu’s ’secret’ visit to Moscow. We saw reports in various media. They are inconsistent. Other than that, I cannot tell you anything. I have no detailed information in the matter, or any information in the matter. We have seen the reports.” On Wednesday, Ynet revealed that Netanyahu left Israel on a private jet belonging Israeli millionaire Yossi Maiman. Earlier Wednesday, Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper reported that his destination was Russia. The prime minister’s aides who published the false announcements of his whereabouts were a loss for words. Wednesday night the Prime Minister’s Office published yet another announcement in an attempt to rectify the damage, said, “The prime minister was busy with secret, classified activity. The military secretary took his own initiative to defend this activity.” http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3775025,00.html |
911 was an inside job – The Five Dancing Israelis Arrested On 9-11
911 was an inside job
English sub French on Fox TV, in french tv the official version is still the true…
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x9l1e8_11-septembre-2001-les-usa-decouvren_news
—————————————————————————
—————————————————————————
| On the day of the 9-11 attacks, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was asked what the attacks would mean for US-Israeli relations. His quick reply was: “It’s very good…….Well, it’s not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy (for Israel)” |
|
|
The Five Dancing Israelis Arrested On 9-11
A Mossad surveillance team made quite a public spectacle of themselves on 9-11.
Police received several calls from angry New Jersey residents claiming “middle-eastern” men with a white van were videotaping the disaster with shouts of joy and mockery. (2) “They were like happy, you know … They didn’t look shocked to me” said a witness. (3)
Witnesses saw them jumping for joy in Liberty State Park after the initial impact (5). Later on, other witnesses saw them celebrating on a roof in Weehawken, and still more witnesses later saw them celebrating with high fives in a Jersey City parking lot. (6) |
|||
|
||||
|
One anonymous phone call to the authorities actually led them to close down all of New York’s bridges and tunnels. The mystery caller told the 9-1-1 dispatcher that a group of Palestinians were mixing a bomb inside of a white van headed for the Holland Tunnel. Here’s the transcript from NBC News:
(*Writer’s note: Why would this mystery caller specifically say that these “Arabs” were Palestinians? How would he know that? Palestinians usually dress in western style clothes, not “sheikh uniforms”) |
 |
Based on that phone call, police then issued a “Be-on-the-Lookout” alert for a white mini-van heading for the city’s bridges and tunnels from New Jersey.
|
|
| When a van fitting that exact description was stopped just before crossing into New York, the suspicious “middle-easterners” were apprehended. Imagine the surprise of the police officers when these terror suspects turned out to be Israelis!According to ABC’s 20/20, when the van belonging to the cheering Israelis was stopped by the police, the driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg, told the officers: | ||
Why did he feel Palestinians were a problem for the NYPD? The police and FBI field agents became very suspicious when they found maps of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters (the same items that the hijackers supposedly used), $4700 cash stuffed in a sock, and foreign passports. Police also told the Bergen Record that bomb sniffing dogs were brought to the van and that they reacted as if they had smelled explosives. (11)
|
|
The Jerusalem Post later reported that a white van with a bomb was stopped as it approached the George Washington Bridge, but the ethnicity of the suspects was not revealed. Here’s what the Jerusalem Post reported on September 12, 2001:
It was reported the van contained tonnes of explosives (14). What’s really intriguing is that ABC’s 20/20 (15), the New York Post (16), and the New Jersey Bergen Record (17) all clearly and unambiguously reported that a white van with Israelis was intercepted on a ramp near Route 3, which leads directly to the Lincoln Tunnel. But the Jerusalem Post, Israeli National News (Arutz Sheva) (18), and Yediot America, (19) all reported, just as clearly and unambiguously, that a white van with Israelis was stopped on a ramp leading to the George Washington Bridge, which is several miles north of the Lincoln Tunnel. It appears as if there may actually have been two white vans involved, one stopped on each crossing. This would not only explain the conflicting reports as to the actual location of the arrests, but would also explain how so many credible eye-witnesses all saw celebrating “middle-easterners” in a white van in so many different locations. It also explains why the New York Post and Steve Gordon (lawyer for the 5 Israelis) originally described how three Israelis were arrested but later increased the total to five. Perhaps one van was meant to drop off a bomb while the other was meant to pick up the first set of drivers while re-crossing back into New Jersey? If a van was to be used as a parked time-bomb on the GW Bridge, then certainly the drivers would need to have a “get-away van” to pick them up and escape. And notice how the van (or vans) stayed away from the third major crossing -the Holland Tunnel- which was where the police had originally been directed to by that anti-Palestinian 9-1-1 “mystery caller”. A classic misdirection play. From there, the story gets becomes even more suspicious. The Israelis worked for a Weehawken moving company known as Urban Moving Systems. An American employee of Urban Moving Systems told the The Record of New Jersey that a majority of his co-workers were Israelis and they were joking about the attacks.
A few days after the attacks, Urban Moving System’s Israeli owner, Dominick Suter, dropped his business and fled the country for Israel. He was in such a hurry to flee America that some of Urban Moving System’s customers were left with their furniture stranded in storage facilities (21).
The Jewish weekly The Forward reported that the FBI finally concluded that at least two of the detained Israelis were agents working for the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency, and that Urban Moving Systems, the ostensible employer of the five Israelis, was a front operation. This was confirmed by two former CIA officers, and they noted that movers’ vans are a common intelligence cover. (23). The Israelis were held in custody for 71 days before being quietly released. (24)
|
| Several of the detainees discussed their experience in America on an Israeli talk show after their return home. Said one of the men, denying that they were laughing or happy on the morning of Sept. 11, “The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event.” (26) |
How did they know there would be an event to document on 9/11?
It doesn’t take Sherlock Holmes to connect the dots of the dancing Israeli Mossad agents – here’s the most logical scenario:
| 1. The Israeli “movers” cheered the 9-11 attacks to celebrate the successful accomplishment of the greatest spy operation ever pulled off in history.2. One of them, or an accomplice, then calls a 9-1-1 police dispatcher to report Palestinian bomb-makers in a white van headed for the Holland Tunnel.
3. Having thus pre-framed the Palestinians with this phone call, the Israeli bombers then head for the George Washington Bridge instead, where they will drop off their time-bomb van and escape with Urban Moving accomplices. 4. But the police react very wisely and proactively by closing off ALL bridges and tunnels instead of just the Holland Tunnel. This move inadvertently foils the Israelis’ misdirection play and leads to their own capture and 40 day torture. 5. To cover up this story, the U.S. Justice Department rounds up over 1000 Arabs for minor immigration violations and places them in New York area jails. The Israelis therefore become less conspicuous as the government and media can now claim that the Israelis were just immigration violators caught in the same dragnet as many other Arabs. 6. After several months, FBI and Justice Department “higher-ups” are able to gradually push aside the local FBI agents and free the Israelis quietly. |
Osama bin Laden was immediately blamed for the 9/11 attacks even though he had no previous record of doing anything on this scale. Immediately after the Flight 11 hit World Trade Center 1
CIA Director George Tenet said “You know, this has bin Laden’s fingerprints all over it.” (27)
The compliant mainstream media completely ignored the Israeli connection. Immediately following the 9-11 attacks the media was filled with stories linking the attacks to bin Laden. TV talking-heads, “experts”, and scribblers of every stripe spoon-fed a gullible American public a steady diet of the most outrageous propaganda imaginable.
We were told that the reason bin Laden attacked the USA was because he hates our “freedom” and “democracy”. The Muslims were “medieval” and they wanted to destroy us because they envied our wealth, were still bitter about the Crusades, and were offended by Britney Spears shaking her tits and ass all over the place!
But bin Laden strongly denied any role in the attacks and suggested that Zionists orchestrated the
9-11 attacks. The BBC published bin Laden’s statement of denial in which he said:
| “I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the present century a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks. … The American system is totally in control of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States.” (28) |
You never heard that quote on your nightly newscast did you?
| [A] number of intelligence officials have raised questions about Osama bin Laden’s capabilities. “This guy sits in a cave in Afghanistan and he’s running this operation?” one C.I.A. official asked. “It’s so huge. He couldn’t have done it alone.” A senior military officer told me that because of the visas and other documentation needed to infiltrate team members into the United States a major foreign intelligence service might also have been involved. (29) |
Bin Laden is not named as the perpetrator of 9/11 by the FBI:
|
When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden’s Most Wanted web page (30), [Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI] said, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.” (31)
|
To date, the only shred of “evidence” to be uncovered against bin Laden is a barely audible fuzzy amateur video that the Pentagon just happened to find “lying around” in Afghanistan. How very convenient, and how very fake. (33)
There is no evidence, be it hard or circumstantial, to link the Al Qaeda “terrorist network” to these acts of terror, but there is a mountain of evidence, both hard and circumstantial, which suggests that Zionists have been very busy framing Arabs for terror plots against America.
| “I think there is very compelling evidence that at least some of the terrorists were assisted not just in financing — although that was part of it — by a sovereign foreign government … It will become public at some point when it’s turned over to the archives, but that’s 20 or 30 years from now” – Senator Bob Graham. (34) |
If the sovereign foreign government mentioned by Senator Graham was an enemy of the United States the “compelling evidence” would not be kept secret for 20+ years.
One final point; at 09:40 on 9-11 it was reported that the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine claimed responsibility for the attacks (35). This claim was immediately denied by the DFLP leader Qais abu Leila who said it had always opposed “terror attacks on civilian targets, especially outside the occupied territories.” (36)
Why would a Palestinian organisation comprising of less than 500 people (37) make the suicidal move of immediately claiming responsibility for the attacks?
| Sharon and the other Israeli leaders aspire to fulfil what the goals of the political Zionist movement have been since its origin a century ago: to turn all of historic Palestine into an exclusively Jewish state. A central tenet of the Zionist ideology is expressed in the racist slogan, “A land without people for a people without a land.” (38) |
The implication of Palestinians in the 9/11 attacks would have handed Zionists a golden opportunity to achieve the above because all Palestinians would have been labelled terrorists.
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/fiveisraelis.html?q=fiveisraelis.html
Video : The Anti-Christ : Massih Dajjal : The False Messiah is in Israel
Video : The Anti-Christ : Massih Dajjal : The False Messiah is in Israel
——————
——
Recently the Islam and Christian worlds have been impacted by a rash of end-times novels and movies . According to religions , the world is heading inexorably towards the final …
video in english
On the 11th September 2001, Israel took full control of the West, including Europe and Japan, and a majority of the so-called Muslim countries.
According to the Prophet Muhammad, saws, the Quran and the Sunnah, Israel will be destroyed when the Anti-Christ will appear…
Israel believes it control gold, oil, drugs and electronic money transfer in their New World Order that they are trying to implement… NWO is the confirmation of the arrival of the Anti-Christ in Israel, in his attempt to dominate the Middle East…
We are currently working on explosives documents transmitted from generation to generation of Muslims, that Saudi government tried to pervert with the help of the Mossad, describing with deep details the rise and the end of Israel, the Prophet Muhammad saws announced the destruction of Israel 1430 years ago with miraculous details, which gives a serious advantage to the Islamic Resistance, all the major events described by our beloved Prophet saws already happened.
I found a video on Google, I advise you to watch it and listen to it carefully, there are stil some mistakes and Allah subhannahu wa taala Knows the Best…
“Lost” American Youth Urged to Come to Israel
Israeli Ads Warn Against Marrying Non-Jews
“Lost” American Youth Urged to Come to Israel
By JONATHAN COOK
Nazareth
The Israeli government has launched a television and internet advertising campaign urging Israelis to inform on Jewish friends and relatives abroad who may be in danger of marrying non-Jews.
The advertisements, employing what the Israeli media described as “scare tactics”, are designed to stop assimilation through intermarriage among young diaspora Jews by encouraging their move to Israel.
The campaign, which cost $800,000, was created in response to reports that half of all Jews outside Israel marry non-Jews. It is just one of several initiatives by the Israeli state and private organizations to try to increase the size of Israel’s Jewish population.
According to one ad, voiced over by one of the country’s leading news anchors, assimilation is “a strategic national threat”, warning: “More than 50 per cent of diaspora youth assimilate and are lost to us.”
Adam Keller, of Gush Shalom, an Israeli peace group, said this was a reference both to a general fear in Israel that the Jewish people may one 
day disappear through assimilation and to a more specific concern that, if it is to survive, Israel must recruit more Jews to its “demographic war” against Palestinians.
The issue of assimilation has been thrust into the limelight by a series of surveys over several years carried out by the Jewish People Policy Planning Institute, a think-tank established in Jerusalem in 2002 comprising leading Israeli and diaspora officials.
The institute’s research has shown that Israel is the only country in the world with a significant Jewish population not decreasing in size. The decline elsewhere is ascribed both to low birth rates and to widespread intermarriage.
According to the institute, about half of all Jews in western Europe and the United States assimilate by intermarrying, while the figure for the former Soviet Jewry is reported to reach 80 per cent.
Israel, whose Jewish population of 5.6 million accounts for 41 per cent of worldwide Jewry, has obstructed intermarriage between its Jewish and Arab citizens by refusing to recognize such marriages unless they are performed abroad.
The advertising campaign is directed particularly at Jews in the United States and Canada, whose combined 5.7 million Jews constitute the world’s largest Jewish population. Most belong to the liberal Reform stream of Judaism that, unlike Orthodoxy, does not oppose intermarriage.
One-third of Jews in the diaspora are believed to have relatives in Israel.
According to the campaign’s organizers, more than 200 Israelis rang a hotline to report names of Jews living abroad after the first TV advertisement was run on Wednesday. Callers left details of email addresses and Facebook and Twitter accounts.
The 30-second clip featured a series of missing-person posters on street corners, in subways and on telephone boxes showing images of Jewish youths above the word “Lost” in different languages. A voiceover asks anyone who “knows a young Jew living abroad” to call the hotline. “Together, we will strengthen their connection to Israel, so that we don’t lose them.”
The campaign supports a government-backed program, Masa, that subsidizes stays and courses in Israel of up to one year in a bid to persuade Jews to immigrate and become citizens. About 8,000 diaspora Jews attend its program each year.
The government has been trying to develop Masa alongside a rival programß, Birthright Israel, which brings nearly 20,000 diaspora youngsters to Israel each year on sponsored 10-day trips to meet Israeli soldiers and visit sites in Israel and the West Bank promoted as important to the Jewish people.
Although Birthright is regarded as useful in encouraging a positive image of Israel, officials fear it has only a limited effect on attracting its mainly North American participants to move to Israel. Many regard it as an all-paid holiday.
Differences in the approach of the two programmes were underlined in July when a Birthright director, Shlomo Lifshittz, resigned and moved to Masa after telling the Israeli media he had been forbidden from urging Birthright participants to migrate to Israel and shun intermarriage.
In launching the campaign, Masa’s chief executive, Ayelet Shilo-Tamir, warned that assimilation worldwide was putting Jews “on the verge of negative growth”.
Masa officials said young Jews who participate in their projects strengthened their Jewish identity and were more likely to become politically and socially active on behalf of Israel-related issues.
The campaign quickly provoked a storm of debate on Jewish blog sites, especially in the United States, with some terming it “divisive” and an insult to Jewish offspring of intermarriage. A link to Masa’s “Lost” campaign had been dropped from the front page of its website yesterday, possibly in response to the backlash.
The campaign will probably strike a chord in Israel, however, where a poll in 2007 found that 46 per cent of Israeli Jews believed all Jews should live in Israel because it was “the only way Israel and the Jewish people will be strengthened”.
That position has been echoed by Israel’s leaders, though most have been careful not to upset the delicate balance of relations with diaspora communities.
Former prime minister Ariel Sharon was widely regarded as having overstepped those bounds in 2004 during a visit to France when he urged French Jews to come to Israel because France was experiencing “the spread of the wildest anti-Semitism”.
Sharon had been outspoken in wanting one million Jews to immigrate to Israel to counter a “demographic threat” from the rapid growth of the Palestinian populations in both Israel and the occupied territories. Numerical parity between Jews and Palestinians living in the region is expected to be reached within a decade.
That theme has been picked up by his successors, Ehud Olmert and Benjamin Netanyahu.
There is growing concern in Israel that immigration rates have steadily declined since a large wave of one million Jews arrived from the former Soviet Union through the 1990s. The absorption figure for last year – at 16,500 – was the lowest since the 1980s. It is also believed that there is a growing trend of better-off Jews leaving Israel to live abroad, though figures are not publicized.
Mr Keller, of Gush Shalom, said few Jews in the United States or Europe, the main target of the campaign, needed to come to Israel for material reasons. “They come from ideological motives, and many of them are right-wing nationalists who can be encouraged to settle in the West Bank.”
The Israeli government and various organisations subsidize the immigration of diaspora Jews to Israel.
Last year the Jewish Agency handed over responsibility for locating new immigrants to Nefesh B’Nefesh, a private organization that promotes a dozen settlements in the West Bank on its website, including hardline communities such as Kedumim, near Nablus, and Efrat, near Bethlehem.
“Last week Israeli TV showed a group of immigrants arriving in Israel to go to Efrat,” said Mr Keller. “They were shown being greeted at the airport by a large clapping crowds of Israelis waving flags in support.”
Jonathan Cook is a writer and journalist based in Nazareth, Israel. His latest books are “Israel and the Clash of Civilisations: Iraq, Iran and the Plan to Remake the Middle East” (Pluto Press) and “Disappearing Palestine: Israel’s Experiments in Human Despair” (Zed Books). His website is www.jkcook.net.
A version of this article originally appeared in The National (www.thenational.ae), published in Abu Dhabi.
http://www.counterpunch.org/cook09072009.html
